Suppr超能文献

[动物源性组织中己烯雌酚测定化学方法的比较评估]

[Comparative evaluation of chemical methods for determining diethylstilbestrol in tissues of animal origin].

作者信息

Perevoshchikova K A, Parinov V Ia, Vavilina G P, Solov'eva L Ia

出版信息

Vopr Med Khim. 1971 Jul-Aug;17(4):439-43.

PMID:5317631
Abstract

Three chemical methods for determination diethylstilbestrol (DES) in biological material (Jons and Deferage, 1953; Ponder, 1966; Official Method of Pharmacopoeia, USA, 1965) were compared. The most adequate method for determination of DES in animal tissue is the Official method of Pharmacopoeia based on a specific reaction. The method yields reproducible results. Average recovery of pure DES added to biological material was 78%. The method by Jons and Deferage though providing recovery of 86% of the added DES is based on nonspecific reaction with SbCl5, which resulted in too high results. Method of Pharmacopoeia (USA) was used to determine residual amounts of DES in tissues of a rabbit, implanted with 0.1 mg DES per 1 kg weight. One month after implantation, trace amounts of DES were detected only in muscle tissues. Two and three months after implantation, the residual amounts of DES in the rabbit tissues were not detected.

摘要

比较了三种测定生物材料中己烯雌酚(DES)的化学方法(Jons和Deferage,1953年;Ponder,1966年;美国药典官方方法,1965年)。测定动物组织中DES的最合适方法是基于特定反应的药典官方方法。该方法可产生可重复的结果。添加到生物材料中的纯DES的平均回收率为78%。Jons和Deferage的方法虽然添加的DES回收率为86%,但该方法基于与SbCl5的非特异性反应,导致结果过高。美国药典方法用于测定每1千克体重植入0.1毫克DES的兔子组织中DES的残留量。植入后一个月,仅在肌肉组织中检测到痕量的DES。植入后两个月和三个月,未检测到兔子组织中DES的残留量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验