Wexler H K, De Leon G
Pavlov J Biol Sci. 1979 Jan-Mar;14(1):20-30. doi: 10.1007/BF03001813.
Recent efforts have demonstrated classical conditioning of human systolic pressure (De Leon, 1972). The present research attempted a replication with longer sessions and to maximize the CS+, CS- differentiation by varying CS+ durations. Student volunteers (N = 64) underwent four, 50 minute sessions, three conditioning and one extinction, distributed over two weeks. Shock (UCS) occurred intermittently in light-on (CS+) and never in light-off (CS-). Results closely replicated the earlier work, revealing a characteristic UCR, a significant CS+, CS- differential and, conditioned elevations failed to adapt within and across sessions. The pressure differential was inversely related to CS+ duration. Clarification of conditioning influences requires follow-up research on these clients outside of the laboratory. Nevertheless, these studies provide firm experimental evidence for implicating stimulus variables in the origins of certain hypertensive states.
最近的研究已经证明了人类收缩压的经典条件作用(德莱昂,1972年)。本研究试图通过延长实验时长并通过改变CS+的持续时间来最大化CS+和CS-之间的区分,从而进行重复实验。学生志愿者(N = 64)接受了四个50分钟的实验环节,其中三个是条件作用环节,一个是消退环节,实验在两周内进行。电击(UCS)在灯光亮起(CS+)时间歇性出现,在灯光熄灭(CS-)时从未出现。结果与早期研究非常相似,揭示了典型的UCR、显著的CS+和CS-差异,并且条件性血压升高在各个实验环节内和跨环节中都没有适应。压力差异与CS+的持续时间呈负相关。要明确条件作用的影响,需要在实验室之外对这些受试者进行后续研究。然而,这些研究为某些高血压状态的起源涉及刺激变量提供了确凿的实验证据。