Zieliński K
Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 1979;39(5):263-83.
In the main experiment two groups of 6 cats each were trained in active bar-pressing avoidance to a CS consisting of either a 10 dB or 20 dB decrease of the background white noise of 70 dB intensity. The two groups did not differ in rapidity of learning, however cats trained to the greater change .in background noise performed avoidance responses with shorter latencies than did cats trained to smaller change. Within-groups comparisons of cumulative distributions of response latencies for consecutive Vincentized fifths of avoidance acquisition showed the greatest changes in the region of latencies longer than the median latency of instrumental responses. On the other hand, the effects of CS intensity found in between-groups comparisons were located in the region of latencies shorter than the median latency of either group. Comparisons with data obtained in a complementary experiment employing additional 17 cats showed that subjects trained to stimuli less intense than the background noise level were marked by an exceptionally low level of avoidance responding with latencies shorter than 1.1 s, which was lower than expected from the probability of intertrial responses for this period of time. Due to this property of stimuli less intense than the background, the distributions of response latencies were moved to the right, in effect, prefrontal lesions influenced a greater part of latency distributions than in cats trained to stimuli more intense than the background.
在主要实验中,两组猫,每组6只,接受主动压杆回避训练,条件刺激(CS)为背景白噪声强度从70分贝分别降低10分贝或20分贝。两组在学习速度上没有差异,然而,接受背景噪声较大变化训练的猫比接受较小变化训练的猫做出回避反应的潜伏期更短。对回避习得过程中连续五分之一时间段的反应潜伏期累积分布进行组内比较,结果显示,在潜伏期长于工具性反应中位数潜伏期的区域变化最大。另一方面,组间比较发现的条件刺激强度效应位于潜伏期短于两组中位数潜伏期的区域。与在一项补充实验中使用另外17只猫获得的数据进行比较,结果表明,接受强度低于背景噪声水平刺激训练的受试者,其回避反应水平异常低,潜伏期短于1.1秒,低于这段时间内非试验性反应概率的预期值。由于这种强度低于背景的刺激特性,反应潜伏期分布向右移动,实际上,前额叶损伤对潜伏期分布的影响比接受强度高于背景刺激训练的猫更大。