Ariyoshi M, Tanaka H, Kanamori K, Obara S, Yoshitake H, Yamaji K, Shephard R J
Can J Appl Sport Sci. 1979 Sep;4(3):210-3.
Three different techniques of middle distance running (fast/slow, slow/fast, and steady pace) have been compared in terms of oxygen intake, blood lactate and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). The subjects (10 middle distance and long distance male runners) carried out the three patterns of running on the laboratory threadmill according to a randomly ordered sequence, on each occasion covering 1400 m in 4 min. The fast/slow protocol resulted in a rapid and sustained on-transient of oxygen intake, less lactate accumulation, and a lower rating of perceived exertion during the final 2 min of th4 min run. Physiological data thus support coaching impressions of the superiority of the fast/slow protocol.
对三种不同的中距离跑步技术（快/慢、慢/快和稳定配速）在摄氧量、血乳酸和主观用力程度（RPE）方面进行了比较。受试者（10名中距离和长距离男性跑步者）按照随机顺序在实验室跑步机上进行这三种跑步模式，每次在4分钟内跑完1400米。快/慢方案导致摄氧量快速且持续的非瞬态变化、较少的乳酸积累，并且在4分钟跑步的最后2分钟内主观用力程度较低。因此，生理数据支持了教练对快/慢方案优越性的印象。
Zotero 插件