Peer review. Cost control or quality control?
作者信息
Daiger S
出版信息
Calif Med. 1970 Dec;113(6):75-80.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Peer review. Cost control or quality control?同行评审。成本控制还是质量控制？
Calif Med. 1970 Dec;113(6):75-80.
2
Medical audit by physicians.医生进行的医学审计。
Dimens Health Serv. 1975 Jan;52(1):10,13.
3
The Health Care Quality Improvement Act: legislative intent and California action.《医疗保健质量改进法案》：立法意图与加州行动
Rev Fed Am Health Syst. 1988 Nov-Dec;21(6):46, 48.
4
5
Utilization and peer review. Medicine's privilege and responsibility.利用与同行评审。医学的特权与责任。
Calif Med. 1970 Aug;113(2):80-5.
6
Peer review and quality care.同行评审与优质护理。
Psychiatr J Univ Ott. 1987 Sep;12(3):129-32.
7
S.B. 1211--California's new peer review legislation.参议院法案1211——加利福尼亚州新的同行评审立法。
Med Staff Couns. 1990 Summer;4(3):65-8.
8
California's opt-out peer review legislation.加利福尼亚州的选择退出同行评审立法。
Med Staff Couns. 1989 Winter;3(1):47-50.
9
Financial 'heyday' of health care is past. But what about quality assurance under DRG's?
Pa Nurse. 1984 Jul;39(7):7-8.
10
California's approach to the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.加利福尼亚州对《医疗保健质量改进法案》的处理方式。
Med Staff Couns. 1991 Summer;5(3):67-71.
本文引用的文献
1
Utilization and peer review. Medicine's privilege and responsibility.利用与同行评审。医学的特权与责任。
Calif Med. 1970 Aug;113(2):80-5.
Zotero 插件