• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[两种扁桃体切除术方法(斯卢德氏法和波珀氏法)术中出血时间的比较研究]

[Comparative study on peroperative bleeding time in tonsillectomy performed according to 2 methods: Sluder's and Popper's].

作者信息

Muller P A, Clement P A

出版信息

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1979;33(6):976-84.

PMID:554430
Abstract

The authors tried to find out of there was a difference in bleeding time during tonsillectomy by using the Popper and Sluder guillotine. They took three groups of children: one where the tonsils have been removed with both of the guillotines, then a group where only a Sluder was used, and the third group where only the Popper was used. After study of the results, one could only find out that there was no difference between the two instruments. But the authors proposed a tonsillectomy in children only by dissection.

摘要

作者试图通过使用波珀和斯卢德扁桃体铡除刀来找出扁桃体切除术中出血时间是否存在差异。他们选取了三组儿童:一组是用两种铡除刀切除扁桃体的,另一组是仅使用斯卢德铡除刀的,第三组是仅使用波珀铡除刀的。在对结果进行研究后,只能发现这两种器械之间没有差异。但作者建议儿童扁桃体切除术仅采用剥离法。

相似文献

1
[Comparative study on peroperative bleeding time in tonsillectomy performed according to 2 methods: Sluder's and Popper's].[两种扁桃体切除术方法(斯卢德氏法和波珀氏法)术中出血时间的比较研究]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg. 1979;33(6):976-84.
2
[Bacteremia in tonsillectomy: Sluder's technique versus dissection. Preliminary results].
Recenti Prog Med. 2001 Feb;92(2):121.
3
Blunt dissection versus electronic molecular resonance bipolar dissection for tonsillectomy: operative time and intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and pain.扁桃体切除术钝性分离与电子分子共振双极分离:手术时间、术中及术后出血与疼痛情况
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Jul;72(7):1077-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.03.018. Epub 2008 May 13.
4
Monopolar electrodissection versus cold dissection tonsillectomy among children.儿童单极电切术与冷切扁桃体切除术的比较
Saudi Med J. 2007 Oct;28(10):1525-8.
5
Tonsillectomy by guillotine is less painful than by dissection.扁桃体铡除术比扁桃体切除术的疼痛轻。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2000 Jan 30;52(1):25-9. doi: 10.1016/s0165-5876(99)00296-7.
6
Partial tonsillectomy with scalpel in children with obstructive tonsillar hypertrophy.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Jul;72(7):1007-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.03.003. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
7
[Tonsillectomy by electrical dissection versus blunt dissection: a study of 838 cases (Randomized trial of 207 cases and non-randomized prospective study of 631 cases].电切扁桃体切除术与钝性剥离扁桃体切除术:838例研究(207例随机试验及631例非随机前瞻性研究)
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1998 Oct;49(7):541-7.
8
[Acute recurrent pharyngotonsillitis and otitis media].[急性复发性咽扁桃体炎和中耳炎]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2006 Oct;26(5 Suppl 84):30-55.
9
Pilot comparison between potassium titanyl phosphate laser and bipolar radiofrequency in paediatric tonsillectomy.磷酸钛氧钾激光与双极射频在小儿扁桃体切除术中的初步比较
J Laryngol Otol. 2008 Apr;122(4):369-73. doi: 10.1017/S0022215107008328. Epub 2007 May 23.
10
Laser versus dissection technique of tonsillectomy.
Med J Malaysia. 2005 Mar;60(1):76-80.