Johnston D G, Powell N, Gitnick G
Calif Med. 1971 Apr;114(4):14-8.
An epidemic of infectious hepatitis involving 99 patients and employees of a state mental hospital revealed Australia antigen Au(1) to be absent from the blood of all but one of the subjects when tested at six weeks, three months, nine months and 12 to 18 months after onset of jaundice. The single patient with Au(1) at 12 months had no enzyme abnormality to indicate residual liver disease. If Au(1) is the virus of hepatitis these data would support the concept that persistent or long standing viremia is not a feature of epidemic hepatitis. Moreover, results of this study suggest that the Au(1) test should not be used to establish the absence of a past history of hepatitis in blood donors. These data do not establish the value of the Au(1) test in blood donors with active viremia, but do suggest that of 111 patients with recent hepatitis 1 percent had persistent antigenemia and 4 percent probably had circulating antigen antibody complexes and constituted a potential risk to recipients of their blood. The degree of risk to recipients from transfused blood of post-hepatitis patients without demonstrable Au(1) cannot be assessed.
一场涉及一家州立精神病院99名患者和员工的传染性肝炎疫情显示,在黄疸出现后6周、3个月、9个月以及12至18个月进行检测时,除1名受试者外,其他所有受试者血液中均未检测到澳大利亚抗原Au(1)。12个月时唯一检测到Au(1)的患者没有酶异常情况表明存在残留肝病。如果Au(1)是肝炎病毒,这些数据将支持这样一种观点,即持续性或长期病毒血症并非流行性肝炎的特征。此外,本研究结果表明,不应使用Au(1)检测来确定献血者既往无肝炎病史。这些数据并未确定Au(1)检测在有活动性病毒血症的献血者中的价值,但确实表明,在111名近期患肝炎的患者中,1%有持续性抗原血症,4%可能有循环抗原抗体复合物,对接受其血液的受者构成潜在风险。无法评估无明显Au(1)的肝炎后患者的输血对受者造成的风险程度。