MacDougall J M, Dembroski T M, Musante L
J Behav Med. 1979 Mar;2(1):71-83. doi: 10.1007/BF00846564.
Several self-report measures of type A behavior were compared with the Rosenman and Friedman structured interview method of assessment in male and female college students. The student version of the Jenkins Activity Survey was found to correlate relatively weakly with the interview for both males and females, while scales derived from the Gough and Thurstone inventories showed moderate correlations with interview typing for both sexes. A brief scale derived from a recent reanalysis of the Framingham study correlated with the interview appreciably greater for females than for males. In all, these data suggest the need for caution in using only paper-and-pencil tests to assess type A behavior.
在男女大学生中,对几种A型行为的自我报告测量方法与罗森曼和弗里德曼的结构化访谈评估方法进行了比较。结果发现,詹金斯活动调查的学生版与男性和女性的访谈结果相关性相对较弱,而从高夫和瑟斯顿量表中得出的量表与男女两性的访谈类型都显示出中等相关性。从弗雷明汉研究最近的重新分析中得出的一个简短量表与访谈的相关性,女性明显高于男性。总体而言,这些数据表明,仅使用纸笔测试来评估A型行为时需要谨慎。