Suppr超能文献

评估男女大学生冠心病易发性行为的结构化访谈和问卷调查方法。

The structured interview and questionnaire methods of assessing coronary-prone behavior in male and female college students.

作者信息

MacDougall J M, Dembroski T M, Musante L

出版信息

J Behav Med. 1979 Mar;2(1):71-83. doi: 10.1007/BF00846564.

Abstract

Several self-report measures of type A behavior were compared with the Rosenman and Friedman structured interview method of assessment in male and female college students. The student version of the Jenkins Activity Survey was found to correlate relatively weakly with the interview for both males and females, while scales derived from the Gough and Thurstone inventories showed moderate correlations with interview typing for both sexes. A brief scale derived from a recent reanalysis of the Framingham study correlated with the interview appreciably greater for females than for males. In all, these data suggest the need for caution in using only paper-and-pencil tests to assess type A behavior.

摘要

在男女大学生中,对几种A型行为的自我报告测量方法与罗森曼和弗里德曼的结构化访谈评估方法进行了比较。结果发现,詹金斯活动调查的学生版与男性和女性的访谈结果相关性相对较弱,而从高夫和瑟斯顿量表中得出的量表与男女两性的访谈类型都显示出中等相关性。从弗雷明汉研究最近的重新分析中得出的一个简短量表与访谈的相关性,女性明显高于男性。总体而言,这些数据表明,仅使用纸笔测试来评估A型行为时需要谨慎。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验