Galindo A, Benavides O, De Munos S O, Bonila O, Pena R
Anesth Analg. 1978 Mar-Apr;57(2):175-9. doi: 10.1213/00000539-197803000-00005.
Clinical observations on peridural anesthesia were made in 466 patients. The spread of various concentrations of anesthetics injected into the lumbar and caudal peridural space were followed by plotting analgesia-time profiles. Onset of anesthesia and the volume required to provide one dermatome of anesthesia varied little among different anesthetics given in different concentrations. The sequence of appearance of analgesia was also similar, with longer times being required to block larger roots. Quality of anesthesia was judged by the penetration of anesthestic solutions into the largest spinal nerve root (S1); rate of penetration depended on the type of drug and concentration. No drug concentration combination included all the ideal characteristics for block: minimal mass of anesthetic, maximum spread, long duration (minutes of anesthesia per milligram of drugs per segment), low incidence of failure, and fast stabilization time. However, depending on the surgical needs and the characteristics of the patients, some drugs and concentrations may be preferred. Stabilization and onset were slower and drug requirements larger for caudal than for lumbar peridural anesthesia.
对466例患者进行了硬膜外麻醉的临床观察。通过绘制镇痛时间曲线来跟踪注入腰段和骶管硬膜外间隙的不同浓度麻醉剂的扩散情况。不同浓度的不同麻醉剂给药后,麻醉起效时间和提供一个皮节麻醉所需的容积变化不大。镇痛出现的顺序也相似,阻滞较大神经根所需时间更长。通过麻醉溶液渗透到最大的脊神经根(S1)来判断麻醉质量;渗透速度取决于药物类型和浓度。没有一种药物浓度组合具备阻滞的所有理想特性:麻醉剂用量最小、扩散最大、持续时间长(每节段每毫克药物的麻醉分钟数)、失败发生率低以及稳定时间快。然而,根据手术需求和患者特点,某些药物和浓度可能更受青睐。骶管硬膜外麻醉的稳定和起效比腰段硬膜外麻醉更慢,药物需求量更大。