Berlin R D, Oliver J M
J Cell Biol. 1978 Jun;77(3):789-804. doi: 10.1083/jcb.77.3.789.
Ultrastructural analyses have revealed striking similarities between Concanavalin A capping and phagocytosis in leukocytes. Both processes involve extensive membrane movement to form a protuberance or pseudopods; a dense network of microfilaments is recruited into both the protuberance and the pseudopods; microtubules are disassembled either generally (capping) or in the local region of the pseudopods (phagocytosis); and cells generally depleted of microtubules by colchicine show polarized phagocytosis via the microfilament-rich protuberance rather than uniform peripheral ingestion of particles via individual pseudopods. Cap formation can thus be viewed as occurring as an exaggeration of the same ultrastructural events that mediate phagocytosis. Similar changes in cell surface topography also accompany capping and phagocytosis. Thus, in nonfixed cells, Concanavalin A-receptor complexes aggregate into the region of the protuberance in colchicine-treated leukocytes (conventional capping) or into the region of pseudopod formation in phagocytizing leukocytes. In the latter case, the movement of lectin-receptor complexes occurs from membrane overlying peripheral microtubules into filament-rich pseudopods that exclude microtubules. These data provide evidence against a role for microtubules as "anchors" for lectin receptors. Rather, they indicate a preferential movement of cell surface Concanavalin A-receptor complexes towards areas of extensive (the protuberance) or localized (pseudopods) microfilament concentration. In conventional capping, Concanavalin A must be added to the colchicine-treated cells before fixation in order to demonstrate movement of receptors from a diffuse distribution into the protuberance. However, Convanavalin A receptors are enriched in the membrane associated with phagocytic particles as compared to the remaining membrane. This particle-induced redistribution of receptors is particularly prominent in colchicine-treated cells that phagocytize and are then fixed and Concanavalin A labeled; both lectin receptors and beads are concentrated over the protuberance. Thus, the final analogy between conventionally capped and phagocytic cells is that in both cases the properties of the plasma membrane in regions of microfilament concentration are modified by Concanavalin A itself (capping) or by the phagocytized particle, to limit locally the diffusion of Concanavalin A receptors.
超微结构分析揭示了白细胞中伴刀豆球蛋白A帽化与吞噬作用之间存在惊人的相似性。这两个过程都涉及广泛的膜运动以形成突起或伪足;微丝的密集网络被募集到突起和伪足中;微管通常(帽化)或在伪足的局部区域(吞噬作用)被拆解;并且通常用秋水仙碱使微管耗尽的细胞通过富含微丝的突起表现出极化吞噬作用,而不是通过单个伪足对颗粒进行均匀的外周摄取。因此,帽形成可被视为介导吞噬作用的相同超微结构事件的一种夸张表现。细胞表面形貌的类似变化也伴随着帽化和吞噬作用。因此,在未固定的细胞中,伴刀豆球蛋白A - 受体复合物在秋水仙碱处理的白细胞中聚集到突起区域(传统帽化)或在吞噬白细胞的伪足形成区域聚集。在后一种情况下,凝集素 - 受体复合物的运动发生在覆盖外周微管的膜进入富含微丝的、排除微管的伪足中。这些数据提供了证据,反对微管作为凝集素受体“锚”的作用。相反,它们表明细胞表面伴刀豆球蛋白A - 受体复合物优先向广泛(突起)或局部(伪足)微丝浓度区域移动。在传统帽化中,必须在固定前将伴刀豆球蛋白A添加到秋水仙碱处理的细胞中,以证明受体从分散分布移动到突起中。然而,与其余膜相比,伴刀豆球蛋白A受体在与吞噬颗粒相关的膜中富集。这种颗粒诱导的受体重新分布在秋水仙碱处理的、吞噬然后固定并用伴刀豆球蛋白A标记的细胞中尤为突出;凝集素受体和珠子都集中在突起上。因此,传统帽化细胞与吞噬细胞之间的最终类比是,在这两种情况下,微丝浓度区域的质膜特性都被伴刀豆球蛋白A本身(帽化)或被吞噬颗粒改变,以局部限制伴刀豆球蛋白A受体的扩散。