Wendelschafer-Crabb G, Erlandsen S L, Walker D H
J Histochem Cytochem. 1976 Mar;24(3):517-26. doi: 10.1177/24.3.57192.
Employing the unlabeled antibody enzyme method at the ultrastructural level, a comparison was made between preembedding staining and postembedding staining for the detection of viral antigens. The bacteriophage P1 absorbed to the surface of Shigella dysenteriae was used as a model system. Preembedding staining resulted in the specific deposition of peroxidase-antiperoxidase (PAP) complexes as an electron-dense coating around the viral heads. Disadvantages of the preembedding staining method included the agglutination of cells by the primary antiserum which produced a gradient of specific staining and the "bleeding" or migration of electron dense reaction product away from the sites of attached PAP complexes. The postembedding staining method had distinct advantages over the preembedding staining in that PAP complexes were deposited directly over exposed viral heads within the thin section. In addition, the specific immunostaining of viruses was uniform through the section and no artifactual migration of reaction product was observed.
在超微结构水平上采用未标记抗体酶法,对用于检测病毒抗原的包埋前染色和包埋后染色进行了比较。吸附在痢疾志贺氏菌表面的噬菌体P1被用作模型系统。包埋前染色导致过氧化物酶 - 抗过氧化物酶(PAP)复合物作为电子致密涂层特异性沉积在病毒头部周围。包埋前染色方法的缺点包括:一抗血清会使细胞凝集,从而产生特异性染色梯度;以及电子致密反应产物从附着的PAP复合物部位“渗出”或迁移。包埋后染色方法相对于包埋前染色具有明显优势,因为PAP复合物直接沉积在薄切片内暴露的病毒头部上。此外,病毒的特异性免疫染色在切片中是均匀的,并且未观察到反应产物的人为迁移。