• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Psychotherapeutic drugs. Use among adults in California.精神治疗药物。加利福尼亚州成年人中的使用情况。
Calif Med. 1968 Dec;109(6):445-51.
2
Characteristics of high-frequency consumers of prescription psychoactive drugs.处方精神活性药物高频使用者的特征。
Chem Depend. 1980;4(1-2):33-46.
3
Over-the-counter drugs: factors in adult use of sedatives, tranquilizers, and stimulants.非处方药:成人使用镇静剂、安定药和兴奋剂的相关因素。
Public Health Rep. 1984 May-Jun;99(3):319-23.
4
Lifetime earnings patterns, the distribution of future Social Security benefits, and the impact of pension reform.终身收入模式、未来社会保障福利的分配以及养老金改革的影响。
Soc Secur Bull. 2000;63(4):74-98.
5
Condom use and HIV risk behaviors among U.S. adults: data from a national survey.美国成年人中避孕套的使用情况及感染艾滋病毒的风险行为:一项全国性调查的数据
Fam Plann Perspect. 1999 Jan-Feb;31(1):24-8.
6
Sedative drug use in the home-dwelling elderly.居家老年人使用镇静药物的情况。
Ann Pharmacother. 2004 Dec;38(12):2017-22. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E067. Epub 2004 Oct 26.
7
Socioeconomic correlates of drug use based on prescription data: a population-based cross-sectional register study in Denmark 1999.基于处方数据的药物使用社会经济关联因素:1999年丹麦一项基于人群的横断面登记研究
Dan Med Bull. 2007 Feb;54(1):62-6.
8
[An analysis of massive prescription of tranquilizers and hypnotics].[镇静催眠药大量处方分析]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1989 Aug 21;151(34):2139-41.
9
Outpatient prescription drug utilization and expenditure patterns of noninstitutionalized aged Medicare beneficiaries.非机构化老年医疗保险受益人的门诊处方药使用情况及支出模式。
Natl Med Care Util Expend Surv B. 1987 Apr(12):1-43.
10
A profile of children with disabilities receiving SSI: highlights from the National Survey of SSI Children and Families.领取补充保障收入的残疾儿童概况:来自全国补充保障收入儿童与家庭调查的要点
Soc Secur Bull. 2005;66(2):21-48.

引用本文的文献

1
Online peer support for mental health problems in the United States: 2004-2010.美国心理健康问题的在线同伴支持:2004-2010 年。
Psychol Med. 2013 Nov;43(11):2277-88. doi: 10.1017/S0033291713000172. Epub 2013 Feb 15.
2
Drug overdoses in a Canadian city.加拿大一个城市的药物过量情况。
Am J Public Health. 1973 Mar;63(3):215-26. doi: 10.2105/ajph.63.3.215.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of psychotropic drugs by U.S. adults.美国成年人使用精神药物的情况。
Public Health Rep (1896). 1968 Oct;83(10):799-810.

精神治疗药物。加利福尼亚州成年人中的使用情况。

Psychotherapeutic drugs. Use among adults in California.

作者信息

Manheimer D I, Mellinger G D, Balter M B

出版信息

Calif Med. 1968 Dec;109(6):445-51.

PMID:5724876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1503392/
Abstract

A cross-section survey of adults in California provides the following information about use of prescription and non-prescription stimulants, sedatives, and tranquilizers.* One person in two has used one or more of these drugs at one time or another. About three persons in ten have used them in the past 12 months.* Frequent use is reported by 17 percent of the adults sampled and occurs among almost twice as many women as men.* Relatively high proportions of frequent drug users are also found among persons who are divorced or separated, and among those with no religious affiliation. Relatively low proportions are found among persons in skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled occupations.* Contrary to expectation, neither income nor education is very highly related to frequent use of psychoactive drugs. Actual differences may be obscured, however, by the fact that questions in this preliminary investigation combined both prescription and non-prescription drugs. Early returns from a survey now going on in San Francisco indicate that use of ethical drugs is indeed more common in better educated and higher income groups.* Patterns of frequent drug use by age clearly reflect changing needs and stresses. Men, for example, are most likely to report use of stimulants in their 30s, tranquilizers in their 40s and 50s, and sedatives from age 60 on.* Data suggest that persons in low status socio-economic groups are less likely than others to have used psychoactive drugs (in particular, tranquilizers), but those who use them are more likely to have done so frequently. One explanation offered was that these persons do not have as ready access to such drugs as others do. Consequently, there is a selective factor operating: only those whose need for drugs is relatively great actually get them.

摘要

一项针对加利福尼亚州成年人的横断面调查提供了以下有关处方和非处方兴奋剂、镇静剂及 tranquilizers 使用情况的信息。* 每两个人中就有一人曾在某个时候使用过一种或多种此类药物。在过去 12 个月中,约十分之三的人使用过这些药物。* 在抽样的成年人中,17% 的人报告经常使用这些药物,而且女性经常使用的人数几乎是男性的两倍。* 在离婚或分居的人以及没有宗教信仰的人中,经常使用药物的比例相对较高。在熟练、半熟练和非熟练职业的人群中,这一比例相对较低。* 与预期相反,收入和教育程度与精神活性药物的频繁使用并没有非常密切的关系。然而,由于这项初步调查中的问题将处方药和非处方药合并在一起,实际差异可能被掩盖了。目前正在旧金山进行的一项调查的初步结果表明,在受教育程度较高和收入较高的群体中,使用处方药的情况确实更为普遍。* 按年龄划分的频繁用药模式清楚地反映了不断变化的需求和压力。例如,男性在 30 多岁时最有可能报告使用兴奋剂,40 多岁和 50 多岁时使用 tranquilizers,60 岁及以上使用镇静剂。* 数据表明,社会经济地位较低群体的人使用精神活性药物(特别是 tranquilizers)的可能性比其他人小,但那些使用这些药物的人更有可能频繁使用。一种解释是,这些人不像其他人那样容易获得此类药物。因此,存在一个选择因素在起作用:只有那些对药物需求相对较大的人才能真正得到药物。