Samodelov L F, Godehard E, Arndt J O
Pflugers Arch. 1979 Dec;383(1):47-53. doi: 10.1007/BF00584474.
Recordings of total nerve activity suggested differences in the sensitivities and working ranges between aortic and carotid sinus baroreceptors. This result however, conflicts with single fibre studies from isolated receptor zones. Thus it appeared of some interest to compare the function curves of aortic and carotid sinus baroreceptors in the intact animal. This was achieved by comparing the response characteristics of two groups of aortic and carotid sinus baroreceptors in decerebrated cats. One smaller group consisted of 11 receptor pairs, each member of the pair being studied simultaneneously in the same cat, and a larger group consisting of 98 aortic and 49 carotid sinus baroreceptors studied independently of each other. The response of each receptor to wide pressure variations was recorded by inflating and deflating an intraaortic catheter tip balloon. Function curves were derived by plotting receptor discharge in terms of spikes per second against mean aortic pressure. No significant differences were found either in the slope of the function curves or their mean pressures at minimum activity, the latter appearing to be set by the working blood pressure level. Thus it was concluded that aortic and carotid sinus baroreceptors differ neither in their sensitivities nor in their working ranges when in their physiological environment.
对总神经活动的记录表明,主动脉和颈动脉窦压力感受器在敏感性和工作范围上存在差异。然而,这一结果与来自孤立感受器区域的单纤维研究结果相矛盾。因此,比较完整动物体内主动脉和颈动脉窦压力感受器的功能曲线似乎具有一定的意义。这是通过比较去大脑猫中两组主动脉和颈动脉窦压力感受器的反应特性来实现的。一个较小的组由11对感受器组成,每对感受器的两个成员在同一只猫中同时进行研究,另一个较大的组由98个主动脉压力感受器和49个颈动脉窦压力感受器组成,它们相互独立进行研究。通过对主动脉内导管尖端气囊进行充气和放气,记录每个感受器对大范围压力变化的反应。功能曲线是通过将感受器每秒发放的脉冲数与平均主动脉压力作图得出的。在功能曲线的斜率或其最小活动时的平均压力方面均未发现显著差异,后者似乎由工作血压水平所设定。因此得出结论,在其生理环境中,主动脉和颈动脉窦压力感受器在敏感性和工作范围上均无差异。