Petheram I S, Jones D A, Collins J V
Postgrad Med J. 1979 Dec;55 Suppl 4(650):877-80. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.55.650.877.
The speed and patterns of recovery of airflow obstruction were analysed in 209 patients receiving a standard therapeutic regime for severe acute asthma. Initial rates of recovery were rapid. Three-quarters of the patients had achieved 50% of their total improvement in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) within 24 hr. The time taken to reach eventual maximum PEFR was very much longer, 50% of the patients taking one week or more. Diurnal variation of moderate or severe degree was seen in 78% of patients. Length of history of asthma, time of deterioration and other measures of the severity of attack on admission did not differ in faster and slower responders. The rise of PEFR within 4 hr of starting treatment was highly significantly correlated with a higher PEFR at 24 hr and a shorter time to full recovery. Although the mean arterial PCO2 was higher (P less than 0.01) in the slower responding group and they were slightly older (P less than 0.05) and had lower mean FEV1 (P less than 0.02) and FVC (P less than 0.05) these differences were less helpful in predicting which patients responded fastest.
对209例接受严重急性哮喘标准治疗方案的患者的气流阻塞恢复速度和模式进行了分析。初始恢复速度很快。四分之三的患者在24小时内达到了其呼气峰值流速(PEFR)总改善量的50%。达到最终最大PEFR所需的时间长得多,50%的患者需要一周或更长时间。78%的患者出现中度或重度的昼夜变化。哮喘病史的长短、病情恶化的时间以及入院时其他发作严重程度的指标在反应快和反应慢的患者中并无差异。开始治疗后4小时内PEFR的升高与24小时时较高的PEFR以及完全恢复所需的较短时间高度显著相关。虽然反应较慢组的平均动脉PCO2较高(P<0.01),且他们年龄稍大(P<0.05),平均FEV1较低(P<0.02)和FVC较低(P<0.05),但这些差异在预测哪些患者反应最快方面帮助较小。