Krogh E
Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1977 Apr;55(2):227-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1977.tb01304.x.
The distribution of the Arden ratio (A) and another dimensionless EOG quantity (G) devised by Gliem (1971) in a sample of normal human subjects are presented. The minimum, median and maximum values for A are 148--241--449 and for G 34-88-167. A demonstrates a smaller degree of dispersion than G, the latter resembling in this respect the EOG potential parameters of the same sample. The average accumulation of errors due to inaccurate assessment of the included potential figures is almost equal in the functions of A and G. Divergencies between the figures from the present and earlier investigations are discussed together with the general advantage of dimensionless EOG parameters. It is concluded that the present investigation has not demonstrated the need to replace or supplement the Arden ratio by the Gliem quantity.
本文展示了阿登比率（A）以及由格利姆（1971年）设计的另一个无量纲眼电图量（G）在正常人类受试者样本中的分布情况。A的最小值、中位数和最大值分别为148 - 241 - 449，G的相应值为34 - 88 - 167。A的离散程度小于G，在这方面G与同一样本的眼电图电位参数相似。在A和G的函数中，由于对所包含电位数值评估不准确导致的平均误差积累几乎相等。本文还讨论了当前研究与早期研究结果之间的差异以及无量纲眼电图参数的总体优势。得出的结论是，本研究并未表明有必要用格利姆量来替代或补充阿登比率。
