Tegtmeyer C J, McCue F C, Higgins S M, Ball D W
Radiology. 1979 Jul;132(1):37-41. doi: 10.1148/132.1.37.
Single and double contrast arthrographic techniques were compared in 951 patinets with suspected meniscal injuries. Exploratory surgery of the knee was performed in 384 of these patients and good clinical follow-up was obtained in 135 patients. In the latter two groups of patients, the single contrast technique was 97% accurate in assessing the medial meniscus and 96% accurate in assessing the lateral meniscus. Double contrast arthrography was 97% accurate in assessing the medial meniscus and 93% accurate in assessing the lateral meniscus. Numerical differences in the results from the two techniques were not statistically significant. Therefore both techniques can be considered equally effective diagnostically.
对951例疑似半月板损伤的患者比较了单对比和双对比关节造影技术。其中384例患者接受了膝关节探查手术，135例患者获得了良好的临床随访。在后两组患者中，单对比技术评估内侧半月板的准确率为97%，评估外侧半月板的准确率为96%。双对比关节造影评估内侧半月板的准确率为97%，评估外侧半月板的准确率为93%。两种技术结果的数值差异无统计学意义。因此，两种技术在诊断上可被视为同样有效。
