Focht D D, Lockhart W R
J Bacteriol. 1965 Nov;90(5):1314-9. doi: 10.1128/jb.90.5.1314-1319.1965.
Focht, D. D. (Iowa State University, Ames), and W. R. Lockhart. Numerical survey of some bacterial taxa. J. Bacteriol. 90:1314-1319. 1965.-A numerical analysis was made of 77 properties of each of 43 bacterial strains, representing 25 genera from 8 families in the orders Eubacteriales and Pseudomonadales. Four major groups were found, related to one another at approximately the same level of similarity: (1) a large cluster containing the subgroups (1a) Athiorhodaceae-Spirillaceae, (1b) Xanthomonas, and (1c) "inactive" Micrococcaceae-Achromobacteraceae; (2) a cluster containing the "active" Micrococcaceae and Lactobacillaceae; (3) the enterobacteria; and (4) Aeromonas. There was a sharp distinction between the branches of groups 1a, 1c, and 2. The composition of groups was essentially the same whether or not fermentation of carbohydrates (28 characters) was included in the analysis. Several individual strains, notably, Bacillus subtilis, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Erwinia amylovora, were related to none of the groups, and others (two species of Proteus, Flavobacterium devorans, and Lactobacillus casei) showed only minimal quantitative relationships with their groups. These results suggest that there may be significant variation in levels of similarity within microbial groups presently accorded equivalent taxonomic rank, and that some present distinctions among taxa, particularly at the generic level, cannot be confirmed on the basis of overall similarity.
福奇特,D. D.(衣阿华州立大学,埃姆斯)和W. R. 洛克哈特。某些细菌类群的数值调查。《细菌学杂志》90:1314 - 1319。1965年。——对43株细菌的每一株的77种特性进行了数值分析,这些细菌代表了真细菌目和假单胞菌目中8个科的25个属。发现了四个主要类群,它们彼此之间的相似程度大致相同:(1)一个大的聚类,包含亚组(1a)紫色非硫细菌科 - 螺菌科、(1b)黄单胞菌属,以及(1c)“不活跃”的微球菌科 - 无色杆菌科;(2)一个包含“活跃”的微球菌科和乳杆菌科的聚类;(3)肠杆菌;以及(4)气单胞菌属。1a、1c和2类群的分支之间有明显区别。无论分析中是否包括碳水化合物发酵(28个特征),类群的组成基本相同。有几株单独的菌株,特别是枯草芽孢杆菌、肠系膜明串珠菌、铜绿假单胞菌和梨火疫欧文氏菌,与任何类群都没有关系,而其他一些菌株(变形杆菌属的两个种、食油黄杆菌和干酪乳杆菌)与其所在类群仅显示出极小的数量关系。这些结果表明,目前被赋予同等分类等级的微生物类群内部的相似程度可能存在显著差异,并且目前一些分类单元之间的区别,特别是在属一级,不能基于整体相似性得到证实。