Verma R S, Lubs H A
Clin Genet. 1976 Jun;9(6):553-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.1976.tb01612.x.
A reference diagram is presented which is comparable to the Paris banding diagram but which was based primarily on chromosomes studied by acridine orange reverse banding. Comparison with the Paris Conference (1971) banding diagram was made. Bands were combined in 13 instances and subdivided in 10 cases. The number of bands was found to depend primarily upon the length and quality of the chromosomes. No major differences between the present diagram and the Paris banding diagram were observed. Moreover, the results with acriding orange reverse banding were comparable to those previously reported with Giemsa R banding. In addition, sequential Q banding and R banding were carried out in the same cells. No significant differences in resolution of bands were observed when these two techniques were compared.
给出了一张参考图谱,它与巴黎带型图谱类似,但主要基于用吖啶橙反向带型研究的染色体。与巴黎会议(1971年)的带型图谱进行了比较。有13个实例中的带被合并,10个案例中的带被细分。发现带的数量主要取决于染色体的长度和质量。在当前图谱与巴黎带型图谱之间未观察到重大差异。此外,吖啶橙反向带型的结果与先前报道的吉姆萨R带型的结果相当。另外,在同一细胞中进行了连续的Q带型和R带型分析。当比较这两种技术时,在带的分辨率上未观察到显著差异。