Erikssen J, Forfang K, Storstein O
Eur J Cardiol. 1977 Dec;6(4):285-98.
In 2014 presumably healthy men aged 40-59 yr the prevalence of previously undiagnosed angina pectoris was assessed by two angina questionnaires: (1) World Health Organization Questionnaire (WHO-Q) and (2) Greater New York Health Insurance Plan Survey Questionnaire (NY-Q). The angina prevalence given by the questionnaires singly or in combination varied between 1.15 and 4.7% (lowest prevalence by the WHO-Q interview version (WHO-Qi) and highest by the WHO-Q self-administered version and the NY-Q in combination), indicating a considerable variation in prevalence with variation in criteria used. Validation of the questionnaires by means of (1) coronary angiography, and (2) follow-up in selected cases, indicated NY-Q superiority over WHO-Q in predicting the presence of coronary heart disease (CHD). WHO-Qi had a particularly low sensitivity without being more specific. However, CHD-risk factor patterns in subgroups of individuals classified as angina-positive or -negative by the respective questionnaires were similar.
2014年,通过两份心绞痛问卷对年龄在40 - 59岁的健康男性中既往未诊断出的心绞痛患病率进行了评估:(1)世界卫生组织问卷(WHO-Q)和(2)大纽约健康保险计划调查问卷(NY-Q)。问卷单独或联合给出的心绞痛患病率在1.15%至4.7%之间变化(WHO-Q访谈版(WHO-Qi)患病率最低,WHO-Q自填版与NY-Q联合时患病率最高),表明患病率随所用标准的变化有相当大的差异。通过(1)冠状动脉造影和(2)对选定病例的随访对问卷进行验证,结果表明在预测冠心病(CHD)方面,NY-Q优于WHO-Q。WHO-Qi的敏感性特别低,且特异性并未更高。然而,通过各自问卷分类为心绞痛阳性或阴性的个体亚组中的冠心病危险因素模式相似。