Suppr超能文献

路滴美、曲唑酮和氯氮卓的比较。

A comparison of Ludiomil, Tryptizol and Lentizol.

作者信息

Murphy J E

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 1977;5 Suppl 4:34-8.

PMID:590610
Abstract

One hundred and seventy-six patients were admitted to an open, multicentre, comparative trial of Ludiomil, Tryptizol SR and Lentizol, each administered in a dose of 75 mg at night. Fifty-seven patients received Tryptizol SR, 60 received Lentizol and 59 received Ludiomil. Nine patients on Tryptizol SR, 10 patients on Lentizol and 6 patients on Ludiomil dropped out for a variety of reasons. A seventeen-symptom rating scale was used and the symptoms analyzed individually. A greater response in the severity and number of symptoms was seen in the first week of treatment on Ludiomil though the differences rarely reached the acceptable level of statistical significance. Global assessments did not reveal any differences between the groups. Side-effects were also similar. Only dry mouth and drowsiness were persistent problems.

摘要

176名患者参加了一项开放、多中心、比较氯米帕明、曲唑酮缓释片和米氮平的试验,每晚各服用75毫克。57名患者服用曲唑酮缓释片,60名患者服用米氮平,59名患者服用氯米帕明。9名服用曲唑酮缓释片的患者、10名服用米氮平的患者和6名服用氯米帕明的患者因各种原因退出。使用了一个包含17种症状的评分量表,并对症状进行单独分析。在治疗的第一周,氯米帕明在症状严重程度和数量方面有更大的反应,尽管差异很少达到可接受的统计学显著水平。整体评估未显示各组之间有任何差异。副作用也相似。只有口干和嗜睡是持续存在的问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验