Wilson S M, Beahrs O H, Manson R
Surg Annu. 1976;8:297-303.
The institution of proper therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus requires an intimate knowledge of the histology and anatomy of this region. It also requires an awareness of the disease entity by the physician and a realization that everything that bleeds around the anus is not due to hemorrhoidal disease. Once the diagnosis and extent of the disease are established, several known facts can be applied in the decision for specific therapy. For small lesions (less than 3 cm in diameter) located in the perianal skin, it is now clear that wide local excision, usually with skin graft, is a safe, reliable method of treatment. However, if these lesions are invading deeply, one should resort to a more radical form of therapy. The combined abdominoperineal resection is the definitive treatment for lesions in the anal canal. In this way, local recurrence can be prevented insofar as possible, invasive lesions can be completely eradicated, and patients with lymph node involvement will be given the greatest opportunity for survival. As is the case in all radical types of therapy, the anal sphincter mechanism of a few patients will be sacrificed unnecessarily. If a lesion is located in the anal canal and does not invade beyond the submucosa, such as those lesions discovered during routine hemorrhoidectomy, it might be safe to undertake wide local excision of the region. Precise pathologic study must be available, however, and the patient must be apprised of this compromise in management and be willing to be examined frequently for evidence of recurrent disease. With present knowledge and development of the operation, radical removal of inguinal lymph nodes should be undertaken when the nodes are thought to contain tumor. It must be realized, however, that the overall salvage rate in this situation is low. Finally, the treatment of recurrent and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus remains a great dilemma. The first choice of treatment for local recurrence should be excision whenever possible. Radiation may have some value, but excellent responses are rare. Lastly, several chemotherapeutic regimens are available for use in specific cases.
对肛管鳞状细胞癌实施恰当的治疗,需要深入了解该区域的组织学和解剖结构。这还要求医生了解这种疾病实体,并认识到并非所有肛门周围出血都是由痔病引起的。一旦确定了疾病的诊断和范围,在决定具体治疗方案时就可以应用一些已知的事实。对于位于肛周皮肤的小病变(直径小于3厘米),现在很清楚,广泛局部切除,通常辅以植皮,是一种安全、可靠的治疗方法。然而,如果这些病变侵犯较深,则应采用更激进的治疗方式。经腹会阴联合切除术是肛管病变的确定性治疗方法。通过这种方式,可以尽可能预防局部复发,彻底根除浸润性病变,并且使有淋巴结受累的患者获得最大的生存机会。与所有激进治疗方式一样,少数患者的肛门括约肌机制将被不必要地牺牲。如果病变位于肛管且未侵犯至黏膜下层以外,例如在常规痔切除术期间发现的那些病变,对该区域进行广泛局部切除可能是安全的。然而,必须有精确的病理研究,并且必须告知患者这种治疗方式的妥协之处,患者必须愿意接受频繁检查以寻找疾病复发的证据。根据目前的知识和手术发展情况,当腹股沟淋巴结被认为含有肿瘤时,应进行根治性切除。然而,必须认识到,在这种情况下总体挽救率较低。最后,肛管复发性和转移性鳞状细胞癌的治疗仍然是一个巨大的难题。局部复发的首选治疗方法应尽可能是切除。放疗可能有一定价值,但显著疗效很少见。最后,有几种化疗方案可用于特定病例。