Lingeman R E, Helmus C, Stephens R, Ulm J
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1977 Nov-Dec;86(6 Pt 1):737-44. doi: 10.1177/000348947708600604.
Four hundred and forty-five neck dissections for epidermoid carcinoma over a 10-year period are reviewed as to local recurrence of neck disease. Three hundred and forty-seven dissections were radical en bloc procedures and in 98 a modified conservative technique was utilized. Cervical lymph node classification was applied and a comparison made of the two techniques. A review of the anatomy of cervical fascias and the technique of conservative neck dissection is given. Evaluation of this series of cases indicate that the control of local disease in the neck in the N0 and N1 groups is is accomplished as well with conservative dissection as with radical neck dissection. The number of conservative neck dissections for N2 disease was too limited for accurate comparison. There were no conservative neck dissections done for N3 disease. We suggest that conservative neck dissection be utilized for subclinical and N1 disease and that the classic en bloc dissection be reserved for N2 and N3 situations.
回顾了10年间445例针对表皮样癌的颈部清扫术,以了解颈部疾病的局部复发情况。其中347例为根治性整块切除手术,98例采用改良保守技术。应用了颈部淋巴结分类,并对两种技术进行了比较。对颈部筋膜的解剖结构和保守性颈部清扫技术进行了综述。对这一系列病例的评估表明,对于N0和N1组,保守性清扫与根治性颈部清扫在控制颈部局部疾病方面效果相同。针对N2期疾病进行的保守性颈部清扫术数量有限,无法进行准确比较。未对N3期疾病进行保守性颈部清扫术。我们建议,保守性颈部清扫术用于亚临床和N1期疾病,而经典的整块切除术则保留用于N2和N3期情况。