Thraenhart O, Kuwert E K
Dev Biol Stand. 1977;39:475-80.
A micro-neuraminidase-inhibition-technique (the Essen NIT) using a glycoprotein as substrate and employing the method of Aminoff for the determination of free N-acetyl neuraminic acid has been developed by our group. The main difference between the micro NI-test and the WHO-method is the mathematical evaluation of AB titer (TI 50) from the investigation of a single dilution only. This procedure is possible, because it could be proved that this reaction follows enzyme-antienzyme kinetics of the Michaelis-Menten type. On the basis of the microliter system and the Michaelis-Menten reaction, the Essen-NI-test has the following economical and technical advantages over the WHO-method: (a) use of only 1/25th volume of the expensive substrate (glycoprotein) per serum in comparison to the WHO-test, (b) investigation of up to 90 sera per technician and day instead of a few sera per technecian and 2 days and (c) testing of nasal washings without further dilution. Regression analysis of test results of antibody determination evaluated with both methods showed a linear correlation with a regression coefficient of about 1. Titers with the WHO-method were 5-10 times higher than with micro NI test, most possibly due to the shorter reaction times. Nevertheless, positive sera were found positive with either test. Strain specificity of neuraminidase could be equally well evaluated with the WHO-method and the Essen-NIT when 5 influenza virus A isolates from Berlin of 1968-1975 were tested against influenza virus X/15 HK immune serum.
我们小组开发了一种微神经氨酸酶抑制技术(埃森NIT),该技术使用糖蛋白作为底物,并采用阿明诺夫方法测定游离N-乙酰神经氨酸。微NI试验与世界卫生组织方法的主要区别在于仅通过对单一稀释度的研究对抗体滴度(TI 50)进行数学评估。这一程序是可行的,因为已证明该反应遵循米氏类型的酶-抗酶动力学。基于微升系统和米氏反应,埃森-NI试验与世界卫生组织方法相比具有以下经济和技术优势:(a)与世界卫生组织试验相比,每份血清使用的昂贵底物(糖蛋白)体积仅为其1/25;(b)每位技术人员每天可检测多达90份血清,而不是每位技术人员2天只能检测几份血清;(c)无需进一步稀释即可检测鼻洗液。用两种方法评估的抗体测定试验结果的回归分析显示呈线性相关,回归系数约为1。世界卫生组织方法测定的滴度比微NI试验高5至10倍,很可能是由于反应时间较短。然而,两种试验均能检测出阳性血清。当用1968 - 1975年来自柏林的5株甲型流感病毒分离株与甲型流感病毒X/15 HK免疫血清进行检测时,神经氨酸酶的毒株特异性用世界卫生组织方法和埃森-NIT均可同样良好地评估。