McFarland W H, Vivion M C, Goldstein R
J Speech Hear Res. 1977 Dec;20(4):781-98. doi: 10.1044/jshr.2004.781.
Tone-pips of 500, 1000, and 3000 Hz were presented at 0-, 10-, 20-, 35-, and 50-dB HL to 10 normal-hearing subjects and at 0-, 10-, 20-, 35-, and 50-dB SL to 10 subjects with conductive, sensorineural, or mixed hearing losses. Middle component (latencies 8-90 msec) averaged electroencephalic responses to the tone-pips were analyzed in terms of peak latencies and peak-to-peak amplitudes. Properties of the responses were generally the same for both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects except that the hearing-impaired subjects showed slightly greater amplitudes overall. The small reduction in latencies with increasing stimulus frequency seen in the normal-hearing subjects was not observed in the hearing-impaired subjects.
向10名听力正常的受试者分别呈现500赫兹、1000赫兹和3000赫兹的短纯音，声级分别为0分贝、10分贝、20分贝、35分贝和50分贝听力级；向10名患有传导性、感音神经性或混合性听力损失的受试者分别呈现声级为0分贝、10分贝、20分贝、35分贝和50分贝感觉级的上述短纯音。对短纯音的平均脑电图反应的中间成分（潜伏期8 - 90毫秒），根据峰潜伏期和峰峰值幅度进行分析。除了听力受损受试者总体上显示出稍大的幅度外，正常听力和听力受损受试者的反应特性通常相同。在听力受损受试者中未观察到正常听力受试者中随刺激频率增加潜伏期的小幅缩短。
