Suppr超能文献

肝阿米巴病既往感染与现症感染的血清学鉴别

Serological differentiation between past and present infection in hepatic amoebiasis.

作者信息

Jackson T F, Anderson C B, Simjee A E

出版信息

Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1984;78(3):342-5. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(84)90115-9.

Abstract

The indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA) test and the amoebic gel diffusion (AGD) test were assessed as tools for differentiating between past and present infection in invasive amoebiasis; in the case of the IFA test the Entamoeba histolytica-specific IgG and IgM were monitored. In a pilot study in which sera from 56 patients with suspected invasive amoebiasis were tested the IgM was positive in 40% of confirmed intestinal and 83% of confirmed hepatic cases, the IgG and AGD were positive in all confirmed cases. A subsequent study was then carried out, in which the tests were used to monitor longitudinally antibody levels of patients with confirmed amoebic liver abscess, from the time of admission to hospital, to one year after successful treatment. The specific IgM levels became negative sooner than the IgG or AGD, with more than half the subjects giving negative results at six months and all cases becoming negative 46 weeks after treatment. The results of this study suggest that the presence of specific IgM, together with specific IgG and a strongly positive AGD test, is indicative of an active infection; conversely, when the IgM is negative, while the other tests are positive, active disease was usually absent.

摘要

间接荧光抗体(IFA)试验和阿米巴凝胶扩散(AGD)试验被评估为区分侵袭性阿米巴病既往感染和当前感染的工具;对于IFA试验,监测溶组织内阿米巴特异性IgG和IgM。在一项初步研究中,检测了56例疑似侵袭性阿米巴病患者的血清,在确诊的肠道病例中40%的患者IgM呈阳性,在确诊的肝脏病例中83%的患者IgM呈阳性,所有确诊病例的IgG和AGD均呈阳性。随后进行了一项研究,在该研究中,这些检测用于纵向监测确诊为阿米巴肝脓肿的患者从入院时到成功治疗后一年的抗体水平。特异性IgM水平比IgG或AGD更快转阴,超过一半的受试者在六个月时结果呈阴性,所有病例在治疗后46周时均呈阴性。这项研究的结果表明,特异性IgM的存在,连同特异性IgG和强阳性AGD试验,表明存在活动性感染;相反,当IgM为阴性,而其他检测为阳性时,通常不存在活动性疾病。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验