Suppr超能文献

不同训练时长对心肺耐力改善的影响。

Effects of varied durations of training on improvement in cardiorespiratory endurance.

作者信息

Hartung G H, Smolensky M H, Harrist R B, Rangel R, Skrovan C

出版信息

J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1977 Sep;6(1):61-8.

PMID:608958
Abstract

Twenty-nine subjects trained for 6 weeks for the purpose of comparing the effects of various durations of exercise. All subjects trained three days per week at 75% of maximum heart rate. Training durations were 5 min (N = 10), 15 min (N = 10) and 25 min (N = 9) with over 80% of the training sessions consisting of monitored treadmill walking on a grade. Pre and post-testing consisted of a maximal treadmill walk and a submaximal bicycle ride for the three training groups and a control group (N = 10). The improvements in treadmill time were 7.7%, 14.7% and 20.2% for the three training groups, all significant. The improvement for the 5 min group was not different than that of the control or 15 min groups. Improvement in the 25 min group was significantly greater than the control and 5 min groups, but not the 15 min group. The same differences were noted when estimated maximal oxygen uptake changes were analyzed. The results indicate that at least 15 and preferably 25 min of exercise is necessary to produce optimal endurance improvement with the training intensity and frequency used in this study.

摘要

29名受试者进行了为期6周的训练,目的是比较不同运动时长的效果。所有受试者每周训练三天,运动强度为最大心率的75%。训练时长分别为5分钟(N = 10)、15分钟(N = 10)和25分钟(N = 9),超过80%的训练课程包括在有坡度的跑步机上进行的监测步行。三个训练组和一个对照组(N = 10)在测试前后分别进行了一次最大跑步机步行测试和一次次最大自行车骑行测试。三个训练组的跑步机运动时间改善率分别为7.7%、14.7%和20.2%,均具有显著性。5分钟组的改善情况与对照组或15分钟组没有差异。25分钟组的改善情况显著大于对照组和5分钟组,但与15分钟组没有差异。在分析估计的最大摄氧量变化时也发现了同样的差异。结果表明,采用本研究中的训练强度和频率,至少需要15分钟,最好是25分钟的运动,才能产生最佳的耐力改善效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验