Somogyi B, Welch G R, Damjanovich S
Biochim Biophys Acta. 1984 Sep 6;768(2):81-112. doi: 10.1016/0304-4173(84)90001-6.
The most important idea underlying our treatment herein is the unity of the enzyme molecule and the medium. Appreciation of this relationship is vital, if enzymology is to graduate from its present reductionistic status to a more holistic posture. Enzymes are biological entities firstly, and isolated objects of physicochemical analysis secondly. Perhaps the most crucial 'biological lesson', particularly apropos of enzymes in intermediary metabolism, concerns the 'cytosociology' of enzyme action in vivo [94,128]. The natural habitat of many enzymes in the living cell is far different from that in bulk aqueous solution in vitro. In order to obtain a real grasp of the nature of enzyme function, one must ultimately couch enzymology in concepts emerging from contemporary cell biology [95]. Notwithstanding, analysis precedes synthesis; and one must needs begin with the individual enzyme molecule. The trenchant efforts of the physical chemist and the organic chemist have produced a wealth of information on the nature of the binding and catalytic events at the enzyme active site. While it is not yet possible to explain precisely the complete sequence of events in the catalytic process, nevertheless, the basic mechanisms by which enzymes effect catalysis (i.e., reduce activation energy) now seem apparent [81,129]. The new frontier is to be found, in exploring the dynamic role of the protein matrix [17]. Not only does the protein provide the 3-D scaffolding for active-site processes, but, more importantly, it serves as the local solvent for the bound chemical subsystem. Thus, the dynamical aspects of enzyme catalysis (for thermally based systems) must arise from the fluctuational properties of the protein molecule. This notion is the common denominator in all of the models in subsection IIC. It is the anisotropic nature of this fluctuational behavior, which would characterize the energy-transduction phenomenon leading to localized catalytic events at the active-site. In Section III we attempted to show that all of the various enzyme models contribute pieces to a single, all-embracing jig-saw puzzle. Some models focus on the dynamical properties of the protein per se, whereas others deal with the stochastic aspects of protein-solvent interaction. The two approaches are complementary, as are mutually interlocking pieces of a puzzle. The ultimate picture depicted by this 'jig-saw puzzle' is still somewhat vague--owing to the present paucity of empirical information on protein motions.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
我们在此处治疗方法背后最重要的理念是酶分子与介质的统一性。如果酶学要从当前的还原论状态发展到更整体的态势,认识到这种关系至关重要。酶首先是生物实体,其次才是物理化学分析的孤立对象。也许最关键的“生物学教训”,特别是关于中间代谢中的酶,涉及酶在体内作用的“细胞社会学”[94,128]。活细胞中许多酶的自然栖息地与体外大量水溶液中的栖息地大不相同。为了真正理解酶功能的本质,最终必须将酶学置于当代细胞生物学产生的概念之中[95]。尽管如此,分析先于合成;而且必须从单个酶分子开始。物理化学家和有机化学家的深入努力已经产生了大量关于酶活性位点结合和催化事件本质的信息。虽然目前还不可能精确解释催化过程中事件的完整序列,但酶催化的基本机制(即降低活化能)现在似乎已经很明显了[81,129]。新的前沿在于探索蛋白质基质的动态作用[17]。蛋白质不仅为活性位点过程提供三维支架,更重要的是,它作为结合化学子系统的局部溶剂。因此,酶催化的动态方面(对于基于热的系统)必然源于蛋白质分子的波动特性。这个概念是IIC小节中所有模型的共同特征。正是这种波动行为的各向异性本质,将表征导致活性位点局部催化事件的能量转导现象。在第三节中,我们试图表明所有各种酶模型都为一个单一的、包罗万象的拼图贡献了碎片。一些模型关注蛋白质本身的动态特性,而其他模型则处理蛋白质 - 溶剂相互作用的随机方面。这两种方法是互补的,就像拼图中相互咬合的碎片一样。由于目前关于蛋白质运动的经验信息匮乏,这个“拼图”所描绘的最终图景仍然有些模糊。(摘要截断于400字)