• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Interpretation of susceptibility testing of ceftriaxone.

作者信息

Squires E, Cleeland R, Christenson J, Boehni E

出版信息

Am J Med. 1984 Oct 19;77(4C):12-6.

PMID:6093512
Abstract

Susceptibility of a variety of bacterial isolates to ceftriaxone was determined by Kirby-Bauer assays using 30 micrograms ceftriaxone disks and by microdilution (MIC) assays using standard procedures. The relation between zones of inhibition and MICs was expressed by the following regression equation: zone diameter = 22.98-2.653 In (MIC). Using this regression line and the breakpoints estimated from ceftriaxone concentrations in plasma 12 to 24 hours after 1- and 2-g doses, the susceptibility of a pathogen to ceftriaxone was classified as follows: susceptible-zone 16 mm or greater, MIC 16 micrograms/ml or less; moderately susceptible-zone 13 to 15 mm, MIC 17 to 63 micrograms/ml; resistant-zone 12 mm or less, MIC 64 micrograms/ml or greater. These breakpoints were used to determine the susceptibility of organisms isolated during clinical studies in the United States. The correlation between the in vitro results and the bacteriologic outcomes achieved in the clinical cases was analyzed to assess the suitability of the chosen breakpoints. The results of the disk assays were correctly predictive of bacteriologic responses with 1,388 of 1,513 organisms (91.7 percent), whereas the results of dilution assays correctly predicted the response with 897 of 941 organisms (95.3 percent). The correlation between in vitro results and bacteriologic outcome in patients treated with ceftriaxone was equivalent or superior to that achieved in patients treated with the comparative agents cefamandole and cefazolin. Thus, the chosen cutoff points for indicating susceptibility and resistance to ceftriaxone appear to be suitable and highly predictive of clinical success.

摘要

相似文献

1
Interpretation of susceptibility testing of ceftriaxone.
Am J Med. 1984 Oct 19;77(4C):12-6.
2
Reevaluation of Enterobacteriaceae MIC/disk diffusion zone diameter regression scattergrams for 9 beta-lactams: adjustments of breakpoints for strains producing extended spectrum beta-lactamases.对9种β-内酰胺类药物的肠杆菌科细菌最低抑菌浓度/纸片扩散法抑菌圈直径回归散点图的重新评估:对产超广谱β-内酰胺酶菌株的断点调整
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005 Jul;52(3):235-46. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2005.02.006.
3
[The correlation between the MICs deduced from Showa disk method and the MICs determined by micro-dilution method].[昭和纸片法推导的最低抑菌浓度与微量稀释法测定的最低抑菌浓度之间的相关性]
Rinsho Byori. 1994 Oct;42(10):1062-8.
4
In vitro study with ciprofloxacin: interpretive criteria of agar diffusion test according to standards of the NCCLS and DIN.
Am J Med. 1987 Apr 27;82(4A):376-80.
5
Interpretation criteria for sensitivity testing of ceftriaxone in agar diffusion test according to the DIN 58940 method.
Chemotherapy. 1984;30(1):49-53. doi: 10.1159/000238245.
6
Antimicrobial activity of ceftriaxone: a review.头孢曲松的抗菌活性:综述
Am J Med. 1984 Oct 19;77(4C):3-11.
7
Differences between ceftriaxone and cefotaxime: microbiological inconsistencies.头孢曲松与头孢噻肟之间的差异:微生物学上的不一致性。
Ann Pharmacother. 2008 Jan;42(1):71-9. doi: 10.1345/aph.1H620. Epub 2007 Dec 19.
8
[Comparative study of ceftriaxone, cefotaxime and moxalactam against 150 Gram negative strains (author's transl)].头孢曲松、头孢噻肟和拉氧头孢对150株革兰氏阴性菌的比较研究(作者译)
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1982 Jun;30(6):341-4.
9
[Influence of antibiotic disk charge on concordance curve of cefotaxime ].
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1982 Jun;30(6 Pt 2):517-21.
10
[Evaluation of ceftriaxone (R013-9904) in the treatment of septicemia caused by gram-negative bacilli].
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1983 May;31(5):362-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Ceftriaxone: a three centre comparative in vitro susceptibility study.
Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Apr;4(2):142-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02013584.