Ryder K W, Thompson H, Smith D, Sample M, Sample R B, Oei T O
Clin Biochem. 1984 Oct;17(5):302-5. doi: 10.1016/s0009-9120(84)90601-5.
Current methods for measuring angiotensin converting enzyme activity (EC 3.4.15.1, ACE) are somewhat cumbersome and have limited the general availability of the test. We describe here a simple four-step radioassay for ACE which uses the substrate 14C-Hippurate-L-Histidyl-L-Leucine and measures the product, 14C-Hippurate. We found that incubation at pH 7.0 (Hepes buffer) increased the sensitivity of the test by 50 percent when compared to results obtained with the pH 8.0 buffer normally used for ACE assays. A split sample comparison study between the radioassay and the spectrophotometric method showed good correlation (n = 47; mean, spectrophotometric, 26.0 U/mL; mean, radioassay, 26.1 U/mL; m = 0.86; b = 3.9; r = 0.868). We found that there was no significant difference between the spectrophotometric, kinetic and radioassay (Newman-Keuls multiple range test), but the liquid chromatographic method gave results significantly different from the other methods. The assay for ACE described here combines enhanced technical ease with the sensitivity of a radioassay.
目前用于测量血管紧张素转换酶活性(EC 3.4.15.1,ACE)的方法有些繁琐,限制了该检测的普遍应用。我们在此描述一种用于ACE的简单四步放射分析法,该方法使用底物14C-马尿酸-L-组氨酸-L-亮氨酸并测量产物14C-马尿酸。我们发现,与通常用于ACE检测的pH 8.0缓冲液相比,在pH 7.0(Hepes缓冲液)下孵育可使检测灵敏度提高50%。放射分析法与分光光度法之间的分割样本比较研究显示出良好的相关性(n = 47;分光光度法均值为26.0 U/mL;放射分析法均值为26.1 U/mL;m = 0.86;b = 3.9;r = 0.868)。我们发现分光光度法、动力学法和放射分析法之间无显著差异(纽曼-丘尔斯多重范围检验),但液相色谱法给出的结果与其他方法显著不同。此处描述的ACE检测方法将更高的技术简便性与放射分析法的灵敏度结合在一起。