Hurst C J, Dahling D R, Safferman R S, Goyke T
Can J Microbiol. 1984 Oct;30(10):1253-63. doi: 10.1139/m84-198.
Microbiological- and food-grade beef extracts, protein hydrolytic, enzymatic and autolytic digestion products, and whole protein materials were examined for their potential effectiveness for eluting adsorbed enteroviruses from membrane filters with observed efficiencies ranging from less than 1 to 69%. Concentration of enteroviruses from solutions of these protein and protein-derived products by organic flocculation ranged in efficiency from 2 to 125%. Both elution and concentration were dependent upon virus type, as well as nature, source, and production lot of the material being tested. Determining the efficiency of virus concentration was complicated by virus aggregation and apparent virus inactivation by low pH. Effectiveness of concentrating viruses by organic flocculation from solutions prepared with the various test materials seemed independent of the amount of precipitate produced during the flocculation procedure. Quality assurance tests were proposed by which solutions prepared from beef extracts, whole protein, and protein-derived materials could be evaluated for use in eluting adsorbed viruses from membrane filters and for concentrating viruses by organic flocculation. Food-grade beef extract seemed equal to microbiological-grade beef extract in terms of both virus elution and concentration. Several of the nonbeef extract materials evaluated were as effective as beef extract for virus concentration, but were less effective for virus elution.
对微生物学级和食品级牛肉提取物、蛋白质水解产物、酶解和自溶消化产物以及全蛋白材料进行了检测,以评估它们从膜滤器上洗脱吸附的肠道病毒的潜在效果,观察到的效率范围为不到1%至69%。通过有机絮凝从这些蛋白质及蛋白质衍生产品溶液中浓缩肠道病毒的效率范围为2%至125%。洗脱和浓缩都取决于病毒类型以及所测试材料的性质、来源和生产批次。病毒聚集以及低pH导致的明显病毒失活使得确定病毒浓缩效率变得复杂。用各种测试材料制备溶液,通过有机絮凝浓缩病毒的有效性似乎与絮凝过程中产生的沉淀量无关。提出了质量保证测试方法,通过这些方法可以评估用牛肉提取物、全蛋白和蛋白质衍生材料制备的溶液用于从膜滤器上洗脱吸附病毒以及通过有机絮凝浓缩病毒的适用性。在病毒洗脱和浓缩方面,食品级牛肉提取物似乎与微生物学级牛肉提取物相当。所评估的几种非牛肉提取物材料在病毒浓缩方面与牛肉提取物一样有效,但在病毒洗脱方面效果较差。