Lajoie G, Lépine F, Lemaire S, Jolicoeur F, Aubé C, Turcotte A, Belleau B
Int J Pept Protein Res. 1984 Oct;24(4):316-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3011.1984.tb00959.x.
The synthesis of the four regioisomers of monothionated Leu-enkephalins (Leu-Enk) from previously reported protected precursors is described. The Tyr1-thio analog was obtained as a 1:1 mixture of the L- and D-Tyr diastereomers. The pure compounds were tested for opiate-like activity by using the guinea-pig ileum (GPI) and mouse vas deferens (MVD) preparations, by assessing analgesic effects following intra-cerebroventricular administration and by examining their ability to displace [3H]-D-Ala2, D-Leu5-enkephalin (DADLE) and [3H]-dihydromorphine from rat brain homogenates. The results demonstrate that depending on the backbone position of the thioamide function, activity can be decreased or increased. In the smooth muscle preparations as well as in the opiate binding tests, the activity of D,L-Tyr1-thio-Leu-Enk and Gly3-thio-Leu-Enk was reduced. The activity of the latter analog was also diminished in the analgesia test. In all biological assays, Phe4-thio-Leu-Enk was either equally or slightly less potent than the parent compound. However, introduction of the sulfur atom in position 2 of Leu-Enk increased the potency of the compound in all assays, the MVD assay being the most sensitive. The results are interpreted in terms of the thioamide (amide) function in receptor recognition processes, the probable behavior of thiopeptides toward physiologically relevant peptidases and the structural divergences between tissue-specific receptors.
本文描述了从先前报道的受保护前体合成单硫代化亮氨酸脑啡肽(Leu-Enk)的四种区域异构体的方法。获得的Tyr1-硫代类似物是L-和D-Tyr非对映异构体的1:1混合物。通过使用豚鼠回肠(GPI)和小鼠输精管(MVD)制剂,评估脑室内给药后的镇痛效果,以及检测它们从大鼠脑匀浆中置换[3H]-D-Ala2,D-Leu5-脑啡肽(DADLE)和[3H]-二氢吗啡的能力,对纯化合物的阿片样活性进行了测试。结果表明,根据硫代酰胺功能在主链上的位置,活性可能降低或增加。在平滑肌制剂以及阿片样物质结合试验中,D,L-Tyr1-硫代-Leu-Enk和Gly3-硫代-Leu-Enk的活性降低。后一种类似物在镇痛试验中的活性也降低。在所有生物学测定中,Phe4-硫代-Leu-Enk的效力与母体化合物相当或略低。然而,在Leu-Enk的2位引入硫原子会增加该化合物在所有测定中的效力,其中MVD测定最为敏感。从硫代酰胺(酰胺)功能在受体识别过程中的作用、硫肽对生理相关肽酶的可能行为以及组织特异性受体之间的结构差异等方面对结果进行了解释。