Korstanje C, Doods H N, De Jonge A, Thoolen M J, Wilffert B, Timmermans P B, Van Zwieten P A
J Auton Pharmacol. 1984 Dec;4(4):287-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1474-8673.1984.tb00107.x.
The antagonist activity of Wy 26703 at vascular postjunctional alpha-adrenoreceptors was quantified against the methoxamine and B-HT 920-induced increase in diastolic pressure in pithed rats. For Wy 26703 pA2-values (= -log dose antagonist evoking a 2-fold shift for the agonist dose-response curve) of 4.96 and 6.43 are found, respectively, whereas for yohimbine values of 5.72 and 6.83 have been reported. The blocking potencies of Wy 26703 and yohimbine have been compared at cardiac prejunctional alpha 2- adrenoreceptors in rats. pA2-values of 6.84 and 6.97, respectively, resulted for the antagonism against the B-HT 920-induced inhibition of stimulation-induced tachycardia. At central alpha-binding sites Wy 26703 and yohimbine were compared for their ability to displace [3H]-prazosin, [3H]-yohimbine and [3H]-clonidine from their specific binding sites in rat brain homogenates. For both compounds binding data indicated a preferential affinity for cental alpha 2- over central alpha 1-binding sites. Wy 26703 exhibited a greater selectivity for cental alpha 2- as compared with central alpha 2-sites than did yohimbine. It is concluded that Wy 26703 behaves as a potent alpha 2-adrenoreceptor blocking agent, that is more selective than yohimbine for postjunctional and central alpha 2-adrenoreceptors as compared with alpha 1-adrenoreceptors. At cardiac prejunctional alpha 2-adrenoreceptors both blocking drugs appeared to be equipotent.
针对甲氧基胺和B-HT 920诱导的脊髓麻醉大鼠舒张压升高,对Wy 26703在血管节后α-肾上腺素受体的拮抗活性进行了定量分析。对于Wy 26703,发现其pA2值(= -log拮抗剂量,使激动剂剂量-反应曲线发生2倍位移)分别为4.96和6.43,而育亨宾的值据报道为5.72和6.83。比较了Wy 26703和育亨宾对大鼠心脏节前α2-肾上腺素受体的阻断效力。针对B-HT 920诱导的刺激诱发心动过速抑制作用的拮抗,pA2值分别为6.84和6.97。在中枢α-结合位点,比较了Wy 26703和育亨宾从大鼠脑匀浆中其特异性结合位点置换[3H]-哌唑嗪、[3H]-育亨宾和[3H]-可乐定的能力。对于这两种化合物,结合数据表明它们对中枢α2-结合位点的亲和力高于中枢α1-结合位点。与育亨宾相比,Wy 26703对中枢α2-结合位点表现出更高的选择性。得出的结论是,Wy 26703表现为一种强效的α2-肾上腺素受体阻断剂,与α1-肾上腺素受体相比,它对节后和中枢α2-肾上腺素受体的选择性高于育亨宾。在心脏节前α2-肾上腺素受体,两种阻断药物似乎效力相当。