Suppr超能文献

三种阿片拮抗剂逆转强啡肽、脑啡肽和阿片样生物碱对豚鼠回肠抑制活性的效能。

Potency of three opiate antagonists to reverse the inhibitory activity of dynorphin, enkephalins and opioid-like alkaloids on the guinea pig ileum.

作者信息

Yoshimura K, Huidobro-Toro J P, Way E L

出版信息

Eur J Pharmacol. 1982 Oct 15;84(1-2):17-24. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(82)90152-2.

Abstract

To test the hypothesis that dynorphin is a K-opiate agonist acting on the myenteric plexus, the potency of two benzomorphan antagonists (Win 44, 441 and Mr 2266) to block the inhibitory action of dynorphin, enkephalins and opioid alkaloids was determined on the longitudinal muscle preparation of the guinea pig ileum. The effectiveness of these antagonists was compared to that of naloxone. Antagonistic potency was established by calculating the apparent antagonist dissociation constant, Ke, as derived from Schild plots. Win 44, 441 and Mr 2266 were about 7-8 times more potent than naloxone against dynorphin, dynorphin-(1-13) or ethylketocyclazocine. Although the Ke obtained with Win 44, 441 or Mr 2266 against dynorphin or ethylketocyclazocine were significantly lower than those of naloxone, the values obtained for these antagonists did not differ significantly in the case of each of these agonists. With respect to the antagonism of the enkephalins or normorphine, Win 44, 441 was the most potent antagonist. Its Ke value for the enkephalins was 2.5-3 times lower than those for dynorphin or ethylketocyclazocine and in comparison to naloxone, Win 44, 441 was about 5 times more potent. Although Mr 2266 was a potent antagonist of dynorphin, ethylketocyclazocine, the enkephalins or normorphine, it showed no selectivity of action. The fact that the 3 opiate antagonists evidenced similar Ke values for dynorphin and ethylketocyclazocine, but different ones for the enkephalins or normorphine supports the conclusion that dynorphin activates preferentially K- but not mu-opiate receptors in the myenteric plexus.

摘要

为了验证强啡肽是一种作用于肌间神经丛的κ阿片受体激动剂这一假说,测定了两种苯并吗啡烷拮抗剂(Win 44,441和Mr 2266)对豚鼠回肠纵肌标本中强啡肽、脑啡肽和阿片生物碱抑制作用的阻断效能。将这些拮抗剂的效能与纳洛酮的效能进行了比较。通过计算从Schild图得出的表观拮抗剂解离常数Ke来确定拮抗效能。Win 44,441和Mr 2266对强啡肽、强啡肽-(1-13)或乙基酮环唑新的拮抗效能比纳洛酮高约7-8倍。尽管Win 44,441或Mr 2266对强啡肽或乙基酮环唑新的Ke值显著低于纳洛酮,但对于这些拮抗剂,在每种激动剂情况下所获得的值并无显著差异。就脑啡肽或去甲吗啡的拮抗作用而言,Win 44,441是最有效的拮抗剂。其对脑啡肽的Ke值比对强啡肽或乙基酮环唑新的低2.5-3倍,与纳洛酮相比,Win 44,441的效能约高5倍。尽管Mr 2266是强啡肽、乙基酮环唑新、脑啡肽或去甲吗啡的有效拮抗剂,但它没有表现出作用选择性。这三种阿片拮抗剂对强啡肽和乙基酮环唑新表现出相似的Ke值,但对脑啡肽或去甲吗啡则不同,这一事实支持了强啡肽在肌间神经丛中优先激活κ而非μ阿片受体的结论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验