Mulvihill-Wilson J, Gaffney F A, Pettinger W A, Blomqvist C G, Anderson S, Graham R M
Circulation. 1983 Feb;67(2):383-93. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.67.2.383.
We investigated the relevance of the selective alpha 1-adrenergic receptor blockade produced by prazosin to its blood pressure-lowering efficacy in man. The hemodynamic and neuroendocrine responses to the acute and chronic oral administration of prazosin and phenoxybenzamine were compared in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of 11 patients with essential hypertension. These responses were also evaluated during lower body negative pressure and dynamic bicycle exercise, which produce potent but diversified activation of the sympathetic nervous system. In the acute studies, arterial blood pressure decreased to similar levels with prazosin or phenoxybenzamine; however, hemodynamic and neuroendocrine responses differed both before and during sympathetic nervous system activation. Prazosin lowered arterial blood pressure by reducing total peripheral resistance (p less than 0.05). In contrast, phenoxybenzamine produced a modest reduction in cardiac output (8%, p less than 0.05) with little change in total peripheral resistance, forearm vascular resistance or forearm blood flow. Additionally, plasma norepinephrine concentration and heart rate rose to significantly higher levels with prazosin (p less than 0.02) than with phenoxybenzamine, a difference that was most evident with lower body negative pressure or dynamic exercise. Baroreceptor control of arterial pressure homeostasis was preserved with both agents, except during marked degrees of cardiovascular stress. With chronic therapy, the circulatory responses adapted to the alpha-adrenergic antagonists, and both drugs produced similar hemodynamic and neuroendocrine profiles. The differences with acute administration may be the result of a more rapid onset of action and a more marked degree of alpha-adrenergic blockage with prazosin than with phenoxybenzamine therapy, rather than to any difference in their alpha 1- and alpha 2-adrenergic receptor blocking properties. Moreover, the findings of the present study suggest that the prejunctional alpha 2-receptor, autoinhibitory to sympathetic neuronal norepinephrine release, is of no functional significance in patients with essential hypertension.
我们研究了哌唑嗪产生的选择性α1-肾上腺素能受体阻滞作用与其对人体降压疗效的相关性。在一项针对11例原发性高血压患者的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、交叉研究中,比较了急性和慢性口服哌唑嗪与酚苄明后的血流动力学和神经内分泌反应。在下肢负压和动态自行车运动期间也评估了这些反应,这两种运动可有效但多样化地激活交感神经系统。在急性研究中,哌唑嗪或酚苄明均可使动脉血压降至相似水平;然而,在交感神经系统激活之前和期间,血流动力学和神经内分泌反应均有所不同。哌唑嗪通过降低总外周阻力降低动脉血压(p<0.05)。相比之下,酚苄明使心输出量适度降低(8%,p<0.05),而总外周阻力、前臂血管阻力或前臂血流量变化不大。此外,哌唑嗪使血浆去甲肾上腺素浓度和心率升高至显著高于酚苄明的水平(p<0.02),这种差异在下半身负压或动态运动时最为明显。除了在明显的心血管应激期间外,两种药物均能维持压力感受器对动脉血压稳态的控制。长期治疗时,循环反应适应了α-肾上腺素能拮抗剂,两种药物产生相似的血流动力学和神经内分泌特征。急性给药时的差异可能是由于哌唑嗪的起效更快、α-肾上腺素能阻滞程度比酚苄明治疗更明显,而不是由于它们在α1-和α2-肾上腺素能受体阻滞特性上存在任何差异。此外,本研究结果表明,对交感神经元去甲肾上腺素释放具有自抑制作用的突触前α2-受体在原发性高血压患者中无功能意义。