Richards D A, Cody D V, Denniss A R, Russell P A, Young A A, Uther J B
Am J Cardiol. 1983 Jan 1;51(1):75-80. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(83)80014-9.
The results of a prospective study of ventricular electrical instability after myocardial infarction (MI) are presented. Ventricular electrical stability was assessed using a standardized protocol of programmed stimulation in 165 hemodynamically stable patients 6 to 28 days after acute MI. Ventricular electrical instability was defined as induction at programmed stimulation of ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) lasting at least 10 seconds. Of 165 MI survivors, 38 (23%) had ventricular electrical instability. No significant differences were noted between stable and unstable patients in terms of coronary prognostic index, elevation of serum creatine phosphokinase, coronary anatomy, site of MI, or frequency of VT within 48 hours of MI. The mean follow-up period was 8 months (range 0 to 12). There were 7 deaths in stable patients (5 from cardiogenic shock, 1 from septicemia, and 1 unwitnessed) and 10 deaths in unstable patients (8 instantaneous, 1 from cardiogenic shock, and 1 unwitnessed) during the subsequent year. In addition, 2 of 127 stable patients and 4 of 38 unstable patients had spontaneous VT from which they were satisfactorily resuscitated. Thus, the sensitivity of ventricular electrical instability as a predictor of instantaneous death or spontaneous VT was 86% and the specificity 83%. The predictive accuracy of the absence of ventricular electrical instability as an indicator for the absence of instantaneous death or spontaneous VT was 98%. The predictive accuracy of the presence of ventricular electrical instability as a predictor of instantaneous death or spontaneous VT was 32%. Thus, patients with ventricular electrical instability after MI have a high risk of instantaneous death within 1 year; patients without ventricular electrical instability after MI have a low risk of instantaneous death within 1 year; prospective studies of antiarrhythmic therapy and measures to prevent reinfarction and optimize left ventricular performance are required to determine whether instantaneous death can be prevented in unstable patients; and therapy to prevent reinfarction and optimize left ventricular performance may offer the best chance to improve prognosis in stable patients.
本文呈现了一项关于心肌梗死(MI)后心室电不稳定的前瞻性研究结果。在165例急性心肌梗死后6至28天血流动力学稳定的患者中,采用标准化程序刺激方案评估心室电稳定性。心室电不稳定定义为程序刺激诱发持续至少10秒的心室颤动(VF)或室性心动过速(VT)。在165例心肌梗死幸存者中,38例(23%)存在心室电不稳定。在冠状动脉预后指数、血清肌酸磷酸激酶升高、冠状动脉解剖、心肌梗死部位或心肌梗死后48小时内室性心动过速频率方面,稳定患者和不稳定患者之间未发现显著差异。平均随访期为8个月(范围0至12个月)。在随后的一年中,稳定患者中有7例死亡(5例死于心源性休克,1例死于败血症,1例死因不明),不稳定患者中有10例死亡(8例猝死,1例死于心源性休克,1例死因不明)。此外,127例稳定患者中有2例和38例不稳定患者中有4例发生自发性室性心动过速,均成功复苏。因此,心室电不稳定作为即时死亡或自发性室性心动过速预测指标的敏感性为86%,特异性为83%。无心室电不稳定作为无即时死亡或自发性室性心动过速指标的预测准确性为98%。心室电不稳定作为即时死亡或自发性室性心动过速预测指标的预测准确性为32%。因此,心肌梗死后存在心室电不稳定的患者在1年内有很高的即时死亡风险;心肌梗死后无心室电不稳定的患者在1年内有很低的即时死亡风险;需要进行抗心律失常治疗以及预防再梗死和优化左心室功能措施的前瞻性研究,以确定是否可以预防不稳定患者的即时死亡;预防再梗死和优化左心室功能的治疗可能为改善稳定患者的预后提供最佳机会。