Cavero I, Shepperson N, Lefèvre-Borg F, Langer S Z
Circ Res. 1983 Feb;52(2 Pt 2):I69-76.
This work was undertaken to investigate whether diltiazem and verapamil, two blockers of the voltage-activated calcium channel, interfered with vascular smooth muscle responses mediated by stimulation of alpha 1- or alpha 2-adrenoceptors. In pithed rats (and in isolated canine saphenous vein strips) cirazoline behaved as a preferential alpha 1-adrenoceptor agonist, since its pressor (and contractile) effects were blocked selectively by the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin and were relatively unaffected by the alpha 2-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine. In the same preparations, M-7 (2,N,N-dimethylamino-5,6-dihydroxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene) exhibited preferential alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist properties. The pressor response to M-7 developed much more slowly than that to cirazoline, M-7 requiring approximately twice as long as cirazoline to reach the same peak effect. Pithed rats received a 30-minute intravenous infusion of either diltiazem (12.5-25.0 micrograms/kg per min) or verapamil (6.2-12.5 micrograms/kg per min) that was continued while dose-response curves to M-7 and cirazoline were generated. These compounds depressed the maxima and the slopes of arterial pressure dose-response curves to M-7 but not cirazoline. In canine saphenous vein strips, diltiazem did not change the contractile response to cirazoline but inhibited those to M-7. Verapamil however did antagonize the responses to cirazoline although significantly less than those to M-7. These results indicate that diltiazem and verapamil preferentially inhibit alpha 2-adrenoceptor-mediated responses. The hypothesis is advanced that the pharmacomechanical coupling for alpha 2-adrenoceptors involves a receptor-operated calcium channel that is sensitive to diltiazem and verapamil and, thus, might become activated when the potential across the cellular membrane attains critical values.
本研究旨在探讨两种电压激活钙通道阻滞剂地尔硫䓬和维拉帕米是否会干扰由α1-或α2-肾上腺素能受体刺激介导的血管平滑肌反应。在脊髓横断大鼠(以及离体犬隐静脉条)中,可乐定表现为一种选择性α1-肾上腺素能受体激动剂,因为其升压(及收缩)作用被α1-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂哌唑嗪选择性阻断,而相对不受α2-肾上腺素能受体拮抗剂育亨宾的影响。在相同的实验准备中,M-7(2,N,N-二甲基氨基-5,6-二羟基-1,2,3,4-四氢萘)表现出选择性α2-肾上腺素能受体激动剂特性。对M-7的升压反应比可乐定的升压反应发展得慢得多,M-7达到相同峰值效应所需时间约为可乐定的两倍。脊髓横断大鼠接受30分钟的静脉输注,输注药物为地尔硫䓬(12.5 - 25.0微克/千克每分钟)或维拉帕米(6.2 - 12.5微克/千克每分钟),在生成对M-7和可乐定的剂量反应曲线时持续输注。这些化合物降低了对M-7的动脉血压剂量反应曲线的最大值和斜率,但对可乐定无此影响。在犬隐静脉条中,地尔硫䓬不改变对可乐定的收缩反应,但抑制对M-7的收缩反应。然而,维拉帕米确实拮抗对可乐定的反应,尽管其程度明显小于对M-7的反应。这些结果表明,地尔硫䓬和维拉帕米优先抑制α2-肾上腺素能受体介导的反应。有人提出假说,α2-肾上腺素能受体的药物机械偶联涉及一种对钙通道阻滞剂地尔硫䓬和维拉帕米敏感的受体操纵性钙通道,因此,当细胞膜两侧的电位达到临界值时,该通道可能被激活。