Suppr超能文献

亚组分析对β受体阻滞剂治疗的差异反应有何揭示?β受体阻滞剂心脏病发作试验的经验。

What do subgroup analyses reveal about differential response to beta-blocker therapy? The Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial experience.

作者信息

Furberg C D, Byington R P

出版信息

Circulation. 1983 Jun;67(6 Pt 2):I98-101.

PMID:6133654
Abstract

Results based on small subgroups are prone to much random variation and firm conclusions based on subgroup analyses should be avoided. Caution is advisable, especially with regard to post hoc and multiple analyses. Subgroup findings for which a reasonable biologic explanation can be given and those supported by independent results from other subgroups within the trial are more likely to be real. The strongest support for a subgroup finding in one trial is a replication from another trial. Post hoc analyses from the Beta-Blocker Heart Attack Trial suggest, and are supported by the Norwegian Timolol Study, that myocardial infarction patients older than age 60 years and those with arrhythmic and other complications not severe enough to preclude treatment benefit the most in absolute terms from beta blockers.

摘要

基于小亚组的结果容易出现大量随机变异,应避免基于亚组分析得出确凿结论。建议谨慎行事,尤其是对于事后分析和多重分析。能够给出合理生物学解释的亚组研究结果以及得到试验中其他亚组独立结果支持的结果更有可能是真实的。在一项试验中对亚组研究结果的最强支持是另一项试验的重复验证。β受体阻滞剂心脏病发作试验的事后分析表明,并且得到挪威噻吗洛尔研究的支持,60岁以上的心肌梗死患者以及心律失常和其他并发症不太严重以至于不排除治疗获益的患者,从β受体阻滞剂中获得的绝对益处最大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验