Pandit U A, Kothary S P, Samra S K, Domino E F, Pandit S K
Anesth Analg. 1983 Jul;62(7):679-85.
Physostigmine salicylate (2.0 mg) or 0.9% NaCl (2.0 ml) was administered intravenously in a double-blind fashion to adult volunteers in an attempt to reverse the effects of a 0.05-mg/kg dose of lorazepam given intravenously 30 min earlier. No other medication affecting the central nervous system was given. No differences were observed between the two groups with regard to the frequency of amnesia, psychomotor impairment, or EEG changes during a period of 4 h. The only significant difference in the level of sedation between the two groups was observed 60 min into the study. This difference is attributed to the high incidence of nausea and vomiting that occurred at that time exclusively in one group. Time to complete recovery was the same in both groups. However, physostigmine, not saline, was associated with a high incidence of muscarinic and sympathetic stimulating effects. The results obtained indicate that at the dose used, physostigmine is of no clinical value in treating sedation induced by lorazepam.
以双盲方式给成年志愿者静脉注射水杨酸毒扁豆碱(2.0毫克)或0.9%氯化钠溶液(2.0毫升),试图逆转30分钟前静脉注射0.05毫克/千克剂量劳拉西泮的作用。未给予其他影响中枢神经系统的药物。在4小时内,两组在失忆频率、精神运动功能损害或脑电图变化方面未观察到差异。在研究开始60分钟时,观察到两组之间镇静水平的唯一显著差异。这种差异归因于当时仅在一组中发生的高频率恶心和呕吐。两组完成恢复的时间相同。然而,毒扁豆碱而非生理盐水与毒蕈碱样和交感神经刺激作用的高发生率相关。所得结果表明,在所使用的剂量下,毒扁豆碱在治疗劳拉西泮引起的镇静方面无临床价值。