Suppr超能文献

低剂量美哌隆治疗焦虑性神经症患者。一项双盲安慰剂对照临床研究。

Melperone in low doses in anxious neurotic patients. A double-blind placebo-controlled clinical study.

作者信息

Pöldinger W J

出版信息

Neuropsychobiology. 1984;11(3):181-6. doi: 10.1159/000118074.

Abstract

60 anxious neurotic outpatients completed a double-blind comparative 2 week clinical study of the anxiolytic effect of melperone 10 mg t.i.d. and 25 mg t.i.d. versus placebo. The efficacy was assessed by the Hamilton Anxiety Scale and Clinical Global Impressions. At the end of the 1st and the 2nd week of treatment, the reduction in the Hamilton scores was significantly greater in the melperone groups than in the placebo group, but there was no significant difference in the improvement of the two melperone groups. Similar findings were true for the global assessment. The adverse effects recorded were generally mild and transient, tiredness being the most frequent in both the placebo and melperone groups. No laboratory abnormalities were attributable to melperone. A nonsignificant reduction in systolic blood pressure was observed in the melperone groups, probably due to the antianxiety effect. It is concluded that melperone, in low doses, appears to be both safe and effective as an antianxiety agent. The results indicate that melperone could be a realistic alternative to the benzodiazepines.

摘要

60名焦虑神经症门诊患者完成了一项为期2周的双盲对照临床研究,比较10毫克每日三次和25毫克每日三次的美哌隆与安慰剂的抗焦虑效果。疗效通过汉密尔顿焦虑量表和临床总体印象进行评估。在治疗的第1周和第2周结束时,美哌隆组汉密尔顿评分的降低幅度显著大于安慰剂组,但两个美哌隆组的改善情况没有显著差异。总体评估结果类似。记录到的不良反应一般较轻且短暂,安慰剂组和美哌隆组中最常见的是疲劳。没有实验室异常可归因于美哌隆。美哌隆组观察到收缩压有不显著的降低,可能是由于抗焦虑作用。结论是,低剂量美哌隆作为抗焦虑药物似乎既安全又有效。结果表明,美哌隆可能是苯二氮䓬类药物的一个现实替代选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验