Bolz J, Wässle H, Thier P
Neuroscience. 1984 Jul;12(3):875-85. doi: 10.1016/0306-4522(84)90176-3.
We studied the effects of 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid and 2-amino-4-phosphonovaleric acid, which are antagonists to excitatory amino acids, on brisk-sustained(X) and brisk-transient(Y) ganglion cells in the cat retina. The ganglion cells were recorded extracellularly with a multibarreled electrode in the intact eye in vivo and drugs were applied iontophoretically. We found contrasting effects of 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid and 2-amino-4-phosphonovaleric acid on ON- and OFF-centre cells irrespective of the brisk-sustained(X)/brisk-transient(Y) dichotomy. The maintained discharge and the light response of ON-centre cells decreased during 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid and 2-amino-4-phosphonovaleric acid application, whereas the maintained discharge of OFF-centre cells increased. The light response of OFF-centre cells was not significantly affected. 2-Amino-4-phosphonovaleric acid was generally less potent than 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid. It was shown in the mudpuppy retina [Slaughter and Miller (1981) Science, N.Y. 211, 182-185; Slaughter and Miller (1981) Invest. ophthal. Vis. Sci. 20, 44] that 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric and 2-amino-4-phosphonovaleric acid selectively block the response of ON-bipolar cells. Assuming that these drugs act on the same synaptic sites in the cat retina, one expects a block of ON-centre ganglion cells. Moreover, the drug response of OFF-centre ganglion cells is then consistent with Sterling's hypothesis [Sterling (1983) A. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 149-185] that OFF-ganglion cells receive a direct inhibitory input from ON-bipolars. For some period 19 out of 108 cells responded to 2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid and 2-amino-4-phosphonovaleric acid in an opposite way to that described above: ON-centre cells increased and OFF-centre cells decreased their maintained discharge. It is proposed that this "reverse response" may be mediated by autoreceptors to excitatory amino acids or due to different receptor sites triggering antagonistic response mechanisms.
我们研究了兴奋性氨基酸拮抗剂2-氨基-4-膦酰丁酸和2-氨基-4-膦酰戊酸对猫视网膜中瞬态快适应(X)和瞬态慢适应(Y)神经节细胞的作用。在活体完整眼中,用多管电极细胞外记录神经节细胞,并通过离子电泳施加药物。我们发现,无论瞬态快适应(X)/瞬态慢适应(Y)的二分法如何,2-氨基-4-膦酰丁酸和2-氨基-4-膦酰戊酸对ON型和OFF型中心细胞都有相反的作用。在施加2-氨基-4-膦酰丁酸和2-氨基-4-膦酰戊酸期间,ON型中心细胞的持续放电和光反应减弱,而OFF型中心细胞的持续放电增加。OFF型中心细胞的光反应没有受到显著影响。2-氨基-4-膦酰戊酸的作用通常比2-氨基-4-膦酰丁酸弱。在泥螈视网膜中已经表明[斯劳特和米勒(1981年),《科学》,纽约,211卷,第182 - 185页;斯劳特和米勒(1981年),《眼科研究与视觉科学》,20卷,第44页],2-氨基-4-膦酰丁酸和2-氨基-4-膦酰戊酸选择性地阻断ON双极细胞的反应。假设这些药物在猫视网膜中作用于相同的突触位点,那么可以预期ON型中心神经节细胞会被阻断。此外,OFF型中心神经节细胞的药物反应与斯特林的假设[斯特林(1983年),《神经科学年度评论》,6卷,第149 - 185页]一致,即OFF型神经节细胞接受来自ON双极细胞的直接抑制性输入。在一段时间内,108个细胞中有19个细胞对2-氨基-4-膦酰丁酸和2-氨基-4-膦酰戊酸的反应与上述情况相反:ON型中心细胞的持续放电增加,OFF型中心细胞的持续放电减少。有人提出,这种“反向反应”可能是由兴奋性氨基酸的自身受体介导的,或者是由于不同的受体位点触发了拮抗反应机制。