Suppr超能文献

血管、膜结合血管紧张素I转换酶、氨肽酶M和二肽基(氨基)肽酶IV的免疫电泳分析。

Immunoelectrophoretic analysis of vascular, membrane-bound angiotensin I converting enzyme, aminopeptidase M, and dipeptidyl(amino)peptidase IV.

作者信息

Ward P E

出版信息

Biochem Pharmacol. 1984 Oct 15;33(20):3183-93. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(84)90075-3.

Abstract

Antisera raised against specific renal brush border peptidases have been used to characterize vascular surface membrane angiotensin I converting enzyme (ACE; EC 3.4.15.1), aminopeptidase M (AmM; EC 3.4.11.2), and dipeptidyl(amino)peptidase IV (DAP IV; EC 3.4.14.5) by techniques of differential solubilization, fused-rocket immunoelectrophoresis and crossed immunoelectrophoresis. The vascular membrane-bound enzymes are immunologically indistinguishable from their brush border counterparts and can be solubilized by treatment with detergent and/or papain. The electrophoretic mobilities of the papain-treated forms of each enzyme were greater than those of the detergent-treated forms. This increased mobility is associated with the removal of small, hydrophobic, non-antigenic components of the enzymes. Regardless of the method of solubilization, the electrophoretic mobilities of the vascular enzymes were greater than those of the brush border enzymes. However, after treatment with neuraminidase to remove sialic acid, their respective mobilities were similar. The mobilities of serum AmM and DAP IV were identical to the respective papain-solubilized vascular enzymes both before and after neuraminidase. Thus, like the brush border enzymes, the data presented are consistent with the model that vascular ACE, AmM and DAP IV are intrinsic membrane peptidases bound to their surface membranes by small, non-antigenic, hydrophobic anchors associated with the lipid bilayer. In addition, these vascular surface membrane peptidases are similar to and may be a source of the circulating enzymes.

摘要

通过差异溶解、融合火箭免疫电泳和交叉免疫电泳技术,已使用针对特定肾刷状缘肽酶产生的抗血清来鉴定血管表面膜血管紧张素I转换酶(ACE;EC 3.4.15.1)、氨肽酶M(AmM;EC 3.4.11.2)和二肽基(氨基)肽酶IV(DAP IV;EC 3.4.14.5)。血管膜结合酶在免疫学上与其刷状缘对应物无法区分,并且可以通过用去污剂和/或木瓜蛋白酶处理来溶解。每种酶经木瓜蛋白酶处理后的电泳迁移率大于经去污剂处理后的迁移率。这种增加的迁移率与酶的小的、疏水的、非抗原性成分的去除有关。无论溶解方法如何,血管酶的电泳迁移率都大于刷状缘酶的电泳迁移率。然而,用神经氨酸酶处理以去除唾液酸后,它们各自的迁移率相似。血清AmM和DAP IV的迁移率在神经氨酸酶处理前后均与各自经木瓜蛋白酶溶解的血管酶相同。因此,与刷状缘酶一样,所呈现的数据与以下模型一致:血管ACE、AmM和DAP IV是通过与脂质双层相关的小的、非抗原性的、疏水锚定物结合到其表面膜的内在膜肽酶。此外,这些血管表面膜肽酶与循环酶相似,并且可能是循环酶的来源。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验