• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

放射性核素扫描与计算机断层扫描在脑转移瘤中的比较。

A comparison of radionuclide scanning and computed tomography in metastatic lesions of the brain.

作者信息

Bardfeld P A, Passalaqua A M, Braunstein P, Raghavendra B N, Leeds N E, Kricheff I I

出版信息

J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1977 Jul;1(3):315-8. doi: 10.1097/00004728-197707000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00004728-197707000-00005
PMID:615206
Abstract

Forty-seven patients with a final diagnosis of brain metastases were studied with both computed tomography (CT) and radionuclide (RN) scanning. Fifty-three percent of these patients also underwent contrast enhanced CT. Radionuclide scanning detected 94% of the cases, while CT without contrast enhancement was positive in 89%. The addition of contrast material to the CT examination increased the total sensitivity of CT to 94% and permitted the detection of two cases that were falsely negative on RN scanning and CT without contrast. With both techniques, lesions in the cerebral hemispheres were detected more readily than infratentorial lesions. Radionuclide scanning was less sensitive than CT without contrast in the detection of multiple metastases. Contrast enhanced CT should be used in all cases of suspected cerebral metastases unless contraindicated.

摘要

对最终诊断为脑转移瘤的47例患者进行了计算机断层扫描(CT)和放射性核素(RN)扫描研究。其中53%的患者还接受了增强CT检查。放射性核素扫描检测出94%的病例,而未增强的CT检测阳性率为89%。CT检查中添加造影剂后,CT的总敏感性提高到94%,并检测出2例在RN扫描和未增强CT检查中呈假阴性的病例。两种技术都显示,大脑半球的病变比幕下病变更容易被检测到。在检测多发转移瘤方面,放射性核素扫描不如未增强CT敏感。除非有禁忌证,否则所有疑似脑转移瘤的病例都应使用增强CT。

相似文献

1
A comparison of radionuclide scanning and computed tomography in metastatic lesions of the brain.放射性核素扫描与计算机断层扫描在脑转移瘤中的比较。
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1977 Jul;1(3):315-8. doi: 10.1097/00004728-197707000-00005.
2
The contrast-enhanced CT scan and the radionuclide brain scan: parallel mechanisms of action in the detection of supratentorial astrocytomas.对比增强CT扫描与放射性核素脑扫描:幕上星形细胞瘤检测中的平行作用机制
Neuroradiology. 1978;16:491-4. doi: 10.1007/BF00395343.
3
Relative efficacy of radionuclide imaging and computed tomography of the brain.脑放射性核素成像与计算机断层扫描的相对效能
Radiology. 1975 Aug;116(02):363-6. doi: 10.1148/116.2.363.
4
Comparative results of 99mTc-pertechnetate scintigraphy and computerized tomography after contrast injection in cerebral pathology.
Neuroradiology. 1978;16:173-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00395241.
5
National Cancer Institute study: evaluation of computed tomography in the diagnosis of intracranial neoplasms. I. Overall results.
Radiology. 1980 Jul;136(1):91-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.136.1.7384529.
6
Computed tomography in metastatic disease of the brain.
Radiology. 1976 Apr;119(1):115-20. doi: 10.1148/119.1.115.
7
[Isotope scintigraphy and CT-scanning in the diagnosis of intracranial conditions].
Ugeskr Laeger. 1984 Feb 13;146(7):501-3.
8
Assessment of diagnostic technologies.
Science. 1979 Aug 24;205(4408):753-9. doi: 10.1126/science.462188.
9
A comparison of computed tomography and radionuclide scanning for detection of brain metastases in small cell lung cancer.
J Clin Oncol. 1984 Sep;2(9):1017-24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1984.2.9.1017.
10
The reliability of noninvasive diagnostic procedures in children with brain tumors.儿童脑肿瘤无创诊断程序的可靠性。
Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1982 Winter;4(4):367-73. doi: 10.1097/00043426-198224000-00003.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of nuclear procedures in the diagnosis of intracranial disease.
Neurosurg Rev. 1981;4(3):105-22. doi: 10.1007/BF01743636.
2
Brain CT-scanning and neurological examination in small cell bronchogenic carcinoma.小细胞支气管癌的脑部CT扫描及神经学检查
J Neurooncol. 1983;1(3):197-202. doi: 10.1007/BF00165603.
3
Commentary on diagnosis and surgical management of metastatic brain tumors.
J Neurooncol. 1987;4(3):191-3. doi: 10.1007/BF00150610.