Suppr超能文献

Comparison of three methods of myocardial protection.

作者信息

Isselhard W, Schorn B, Hügel W, Uekermann U

出版信息

Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1980 Oct;28(5):329-36. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1022103.

Abstract

Ischemic arrest (45 minutes), injection cardioplegia (2-3 ml/kg body weight within 1 minute) using Cardioplegin (magnesium-aspartate-procaine-sorbitol) according to Kirsch (90 minutes), and infusion cardioplegia (30 ml/kg body weight within 5 to 7 minutes) employing solution LK 352 (sodium-potassium-magnesium-aspartate-sorbitol) according to Bretschneider (90 minutes) were investigated in dogs in order to evaluate their efficacy of protection during myocardial ischemia and their effects on post-ischemic cardiac function. Parameters studied were myocardial tissue levels of adenine nucleotides, creatine phosphate, total creatine and glycogen as well as heart rate, systemic pressure, cardiac output, LVEDP, left ventricular pressure-volume-work, dp/dtmax, t-dp/dtmax, (dp/dtmax)/IP, and Vpm. According to biochemical data corrected for differences in myocardial temperature during arrest, myocardial protection during aortic cross-clamping at a core temperature of 30 degrees C was increased 1.8-fold by Cardioplegin and 3.4-fold by LK 352 administration respectively when compared to ischemic arrest. Functional recovery was poor after ischemic arrest and better after Cardiplegin arrest. Infusion cardioplegia with LK 352 did not result in a post-arrest depression of functional parameters.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验