Fyffe J A, Ayoub L, Cohen H N, Turner J G, Thomson J A, Ratcliffe J G
Ann Clin Biochem. 1980 Nov;17(6):334-8. doi: 10.1177/000456328001700612.
The clinical value of four laboratory methods of assessing free thyroxine status was compared in 82 consecutive patients newly referred to a thyroid clinic with suspected thyroid dysfunction. The methods of determining free thyroxine used were: (1) free thyroxine index using a thyroid hormone uptake test (FTI (THUT)); (2) a free thyroxine index using thyroxine binding globulin (FTI (TBG)); (3) a kinetic radioimmunoassay (Immophase); and (4) an equilibrium dialysis method. The definitive thyroid status was evaluated by a combination of clinical assessment (including Wayne index), routine tests of thyroid function (total T4, T3, TSH, and TRH tests where appropriate), and by therapeutic trial in one case. The diagnostic efficiency of the tests was markedly dependent upon the method of determining the reference range for euthyroid patients. Best efficiency for each test was achieved using an amended range after excluding outliners. Test efficiency was then 97.6% for FTI (THUT) and the kinetic RIA and 96.8% for FTI (TBG). Misclassification by one or more of these tests occurred in only four patients (mild hypothyroid, euthyroid on phenytoin, euthyroid on oral contraceptive and valium, T3 hyperthyroid). In contrast, free T4 by equilibrium dialysis was much less efficient (86.6%) and was technically the most complex. Overall the kinetic T4 RIA provided similar diagnostic information to the indirect indices. However, further studies of cost benefit in settings other than a thyroid clinic are required to assess whether this method might replace total T4 and/or FTI as a first-line test of thyroid function.
在82例新转诊至甲状腺门诊、疑似甲状腺功能障碍的连续患者中,比较了四种评估游离甲状腺素状态的实验室方法。所采用的测定游离甲状腺素的方法有:(1)采用甲状腺激素摄取试验的游离甲状腺素指数(FTI(THUT));(2)采用甲状腺素结合球蛋白的游离甲状腺素指数(FTI(TBG));(3)动态放射免疫分析(Immophase);(4)平衡透析法。通过临床评估(包括韦恩指数)、甲状腺功能常规检查(总T4、T3、促甲状腺激素,以及酌情进行的促甲状腺激素释放激素试验)以及一例患者的治疗试验相结合来评估最终的甲状腺状态。检测的诊断效率明显取决于确定甲状腺功能正常患者参考范围的方法。在排除异常值后使用修正范围,每种检测均能达到最佳效率。此时,FTI(THUT)和动态放射免疫分析的检测效率为97.6%,FTI(TBG)的检测效率为96.8%。只有4例患者(轻度甲状腺功能减退、服用苯妥英钠时甲状腺功能正常、服用口服避孕药和安定片时甲状腺功能正常、T3型甲状腺功能亢进)出现一种或多种检测结果分类错误的情况。相比之下,平衡透析法测定的游离T4效率低得多(86.6%),而且技术上最为复杂。总体而言,动态T4放射免疫分析提供的诊断信息与间接指标相似。然而,需要在甲状腺门诊以外的环境中进一步进行成本效益研究,以评估该方法是否可以取代总T4和/或FTI作为甲状腺功能的一线检测方法。