Klemetti A
Early Hum Dev. 1977 Oct;1(2):117-23. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(77)90012-3.
Data collected from a cohort of 2913 pregnancies were analyzed to determine whether the varying definitions of congenital malformations influence the statistical result in the search for possible etiological factors. According to three different definitions of congenital malformations, three study groups were formed, i.e. structural malformations, all congenital defects, and all disorders or abnormalities with possible prenatal etiology. These consisted of 93, 197 and 334 cases, respectively. The control group consisted of 2579 cases. Positive associations were noted between the study groups and some factors concerning pregnancy, and the social history of the parents. The associations were strongest in the group of structural malformations and became weaker when this group was 'diluted' by other defects with questionable prenatal origin. Hence, when comparisons for evaluating the causality of significant associations in different materials are made, the definition of the concept of congenital malformations should be taken into consideration.
对从2913例妊娠队列中收集的数据进行分析,以确定先天性畸形的不同定义是否会影响寻找可能病因时的统计结果。根据先天性畸形的三种不同定义,形成了三个研究组,即结构畸形、所有先天性缺陷以及所有可能有产前病因的疾病或异常。这些组分别包含93例、197例和334例病例。对照组由2579例病例组成。在研究组与一些妊娠相关因素以及父母的社会史之间发现了正相关。这些关联在结构畸形组中最强,当该组被其他产前起源存疑的缺陷“稀释”时,关联就会变弱。因此,在对不同资料中显著关联的因果关系进行比较评估时,应考虑先天性畸形概念的定义。