Stefadouros M A, Canedo M I, Abdulla A M, Karayannis E, Baute A, Frank M J
Br Heart J. 1982 Mar;47(3):261-9. doi: 10.1136/hrt.47.3.261.
To determine if postextrasystolic changes in systolic time intervals can be used to estimate the severity of resting or provocable left ventricular outflow pressure gradient, we studied the cardiac catheterisation records of 42 patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy looking for instances of a single premature beat preceded by a control sinus beat and followed by a postpremature sinus beat. There were 75 such instances in 25 patients. In comparison to the control beat, the pre-ejection period in the postpremature beat was shorter by deltaPEP = -20 +/- 11 ms in 73 of 75 instances, and remained unchanged in two. The ejection time in the postpremature beat was invariably longer by deltaET = 37 +/- 20 ms (range: 10 to 85 ms) and the pre-ejection period/ejection time ratio lower than control by delta(PEP/ET) = -0 . 10 +/- 0 . 05 (range: -0 . 01 to -0 . 25). Total electromechanical systole in the postpremature beat was shorter (11/75), the same (10/75), or longer (53/75) than in the control beat, the overall change being deltaEMS = -18 +/- 22 ms. Both deltaPEP and delta(PEP/ET) correlated poorly with the systolic peak left ventricular-aortic pressure gradient in either the control beat (Gc) or the postpremature beat (Gx), and also with the change in gradient (delta G) from the control to the postpremature beat. In contrast, significant linear correlations were found between delta EMS and either Gc, Gx, or delta G; and also between deltaET and either Gc, Gx, or deltaG. Since internal and external measurements of ejection time are known to be almost identical, the regression equation (deltaG = 1 . 65 delgaET -9) relating deltaET and deltaG should be useful for the non-invasive assessment of the magnitude of provocable left ventricular outflow pressure gradient in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with spontaneous or externally-induced premature beats.
为了确定收缩期时间间期的早搏后变化是否可用于估计静息或激发状态下左心室流出道压力阶差的严重程度,我们研究了42例肥厚型心肌病患者的心导管检查记录,寻找在窦性心律控制搏动后出现单个早搏且随后跟随早搏后窦性搏动的情况。25例患者中有75个这样的情况。与对照搏动相比,75例中的73例早搏后搏动的射血前期较对照缩短了δPEP = -20±11毫秒,2例无变化。早搏后搏动的射血时间总是延长δET = 37±20毫秒(范围:10至85毫秒),射血前期/射血时间比值较对照降低δ(PEP/ET) = -0.10±0.05(范围:-0.01至-0.25)。早搏后搏动的总机电收缩期比对照搏动短(11/75)、相同(10/75)或长(53/75),总体变化为δEMS = -18±22毫秒。δPEP和δ(PEP/ET)与对照搏动(Gc)或早搏后搏动(Gx)时的左心室-主动脉收缩期峰值压力阶差,以及从对照搏动到早搏后搏动的阶差变化(δG)均无良好相关性。相反,发现δEMS与Gc、Gx或δG之间存在显著的线性相关性;δET与Gc、Gx或δG之间也存在显著的线性相关性。由于已知射血时间的内部和外部测量几乎相同,因此将δET与δG相关联的回归方程(δG = 1.65δET -9)应有助于对有自发或外源性早搏的肥厚型心肌病患者激发状态下左心室流出道压力阶差的大小进行无创评估。