Suppr超能文献

急性白血病患者的感染预防:胃肠道选择性抗菌去污与全面抗菌去污的比较

Infection prophylaxis in acute leukaemia patients: comparison of selective and total antimicrobial decontamination of the gastrointestinal tract.

作者信息

Bhaduri S, Kurrle E, Krieger D, Pflieger H, Arnold R, Kubanek B, Heimpel H

出版信息

Folia Haematol Int Mag Klin Morphol Blutforsch. 1982;109(3):377-89.

PMID:6182058
Abstract

In a retrospective study, total antimicrobial decontamination with strict reverse isolation (ITD) and selective decontamination without isolation (SD) were compared as means of preventing infection in patients with acute leukaemia. Thirty patients were treated with ITD and 34 patients with SD. The surveillance cultures indicated that aerobic gram-negative bacilli and yeast could be equally eliminated effectively in both the groups. The anaerobic flora was only minimally influenced by SD. The incidence of acquired infections was 1.17 per patient in group ITD as compared to 0.85 in group SD. In group ITD, acquired bacterial infections were mostly caused by gram-negative bacilli (63%) whereas in the group SD these microorganisms accounted only for 25% of the infections. In group SD the total number of fever days was significantly lower and the mean duration of pyrexial episodes was substantially shorter. The results indicate that SD is an effective and inexpensive method for preventing gram-negative infections and might be at least as effective as ITD.

摘要

在一项回顾性研究中,对采用严格反向隔离的全抗菌去污法(ITD)和不进行隔离的选择性去污法(SD)作为预防急性白血病患者感染的手段进行了比较。30例患者接受ITD治疗,34例患者接受SD治疗。监测培养表明,两组中需氧革兰氏阴性杆菌和酵母菌均可有效清除。SD对厌氧菌群的影响最小。ITD组每位患者获得性感染的发生率为1.17,而SD组为0.85。在ITD组,获得性细菌感染主要由革兰氏阴性杆菌引起(63%),而在SD组,这些微生物仅占感染的25%。在SD组,发热天数总数显著更低,发热发作的平均持续时间明显更短。结果表明,SD是预防革兰氏阴性菌感染的一种有效且廉价的方法,可能至少与ITD一样有效。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验