Bhaduri S, Kurrle E, Krieger D, Pflieger H, Arnold R, Kubanek B, Heimpel H
Folia Haematol Int Mag Klin Morphol Blutforsch. 1982;109(3):377-89.
In a retrospective study, total antimicrobial decontamination with strict reverse isolation (ITD) and selective decontamination without isolation (SD) were compared as means of preventing infection in patients with acute leukaemia. Thirty patients were treated with ITD and 34 patients with SD. The surveillance cultures indicated that aerobic gram-negative bacilli and yeast could be equally eliminated effectively in both the groups. The anaerobic flora was only minimally influenced by SD. The incidence of acquired infections was 1.17 per patient in group ITD as compared to 0.85 in group SD. In group ITD, acquired bacterial infections were mostly caused by gram-negative bacilli (63%) whereas in the group SD these microorganisms accounted only for 25% of the infections. In group SD the total number of fever days was significantly lower and the mean duration of pyrexial episodes was substantially shorter. The results indicate that SD is an effective and inexpensive method for preventing gram-negative infections and might be at least as effective as ITD.
在一项回顾性研究中,对采用严格反向隔离的全抗菌去污法(ITD)和不进行隔离的选择性去污法(SD)作为预防急性白血病患者感染的手段进行了比较。30例患者接受ITD治疗,34例患者接受SD治疗。监测培养表明,两组中需氧革兰氏阴性杆菌和酵母菌均可有效清除。SD对厌氧菌群的影响最小。ITD组每位患者获得性感染的发生率为1.17,而SD组为0.85。在ITD组,获得性细菌感染主要由革兰氏阴性杆菌引起(63%),而在SD组,这些微生物仅占感染的25%。在SD组,发热天数总数显著更低,发热发作的平均持续时间明显更短。结果表明,SD是预防革兰氏阴性菌感染的一种有效且廉价的方法,可能至少与ITD一样有效。