Fenwick P B, Robertson R
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983 May;55(5):538-45. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90164-5.
Previous reports in the literature have suggested that lithium medication does not affect the VEP to flash stimulation. It was predicted that this would not be true for pattern reversal stimulation. Seven patients had their pattern evoked potential measured using a 42' check to fractional pattern displacement of 1/4, 1/2, 3/4 and full square. The VEP was measured before, 1 week after and 5 weeks after the commencement of lithium medication. The results show that there is a significant increase in both the N65-P95 and P95-N125 amplitudes when the 'before lithium' sessions are compared to 'after lithium.' Seven normal subjects matched for the age and sex of the patient group were tested twice, once as a 'control' and a further 5 weeks after this. No significant differences were found in the 'control' sessions between patient and normal groups although a significant difference in both the N65-P95 and P95-N125 amplitude after the treatment of the patient group with lithium was found.
文献中先前的报告表明,锂药物治疗不影响闪光刺激诱发的视觉诱发电位(VEP)。据预测,对于图形翻转刺激,情况并非如此。七名患者使用42'方格检查,测量其图形诱发电位,图形移位分别为1/4、1/2、3/4和全方格。在开始锂药物治疗前、治疗1周后和5周后测量VEP。结果表明,与“锂治疗后”相比,“锂治疗前”的N65 - P95和P95 - N125波幅均显著增加。选取七名年龄和性别与患者组匹配的正常受试者进行两次测试,一次作为“对照”,另一次在此次测试5周后进行。患者组和正常组在“对照”测试中未发现显著差异,尽管在患者组接受锂治疗后,N65 - P95和P95 - N125波幅均出现显著差异。