Kazdin D S, Horng W J
Mol Immunol. 1983 Aug;20(8):819-26. doi: 10.1016/0161-5890(83)90078-0.
Recently, we identified a common idiotypic specificity (IdC) present on all of the allo and auto anti-VHa2-allotype antibodies tested. In this report, we immunized allotype-matched rabbits with anti-IdC Ab. When an a1a1 homozygote was immunized with anti-IdC Ab (also from an a1a1 rabbit), two distinct Ab populations were induced which were isolated through the use of immunoadsorbent column chromatography. One of these Ab populations, adsorbed to and eluted from an insolubilized a2 IgG column, was anti-VHa2-allotype Ab (Ab 1), which reacted with a2 Ig and inhibited the reaction between the a2 allotype and anti-VHa2-allotype Ab. The other Ab population, adsorbed to and eluted from an insolubilized immunogen anti-IdC column, was anti-anti-IdC Ab (Ab 3), which was specific for the immunogen anti-IdC Ab. In another experiment, when an a1a2 heterozygous rabbit was immunized with anti-IdC Ab, only the Ab 3 was induced, which appeared to be identical to the Ab 3 induced in the a1a1 rabbit. However, when the expression of the a2 allotype in an a1a2 heterozygous rabbit was suppressed and then this rabbit was immunized with anti-IdC Ab, both Ab 1 and Ab 3 were induced. These data indicate the occurrence of a bi-directional immune response within our immune network system. According to Jerne's network theory, Ab 3 appeared to be induced through a stimulation by the idiotope of the immunogen Ab 2, whereas Ab 1 appeared to be induced through a reverse stimulation by the paratope of the immunogen Ab 2. Furthermore, the production of Ab 1 in these rabbits exhibiting the bi-directional immune response was at least 3-5 times greater than that of Ab 3 production indicating that the response through the reverse stimulation appeared to be dominant. The importance of this bi-directional immune response is discussed in this paper.
最近,我们在所有检测的同种异体和自身抗VHa2同种异型抗体上鉴定出一种共同的独特型特异性(IdC)。在本报告中,我们用抗IdC抗体免疫同种异型匹配的兔子。当a1a1纯合子用抗IdC抗体(也来自a1a1兔子)免疫时,诱导出两个不同的抗体群体,通过免疫吸附柱色谱法将其分离。其中一个抗体群体吸附到不溶性a2 IgG柱上并从中洗脱,是抗VHa2同种异型抗体(抗体1),它与a2 Ig反应并抑制a2同种异型与抗VHa2同种异型抗体之间的反应。另一个抗体群体吸附到不溶性免疫原抗IdC柱上并从中洗脱,是抗抗IdC抗体(抗体3),它对免疫原抗IdC抗体具有特异性。在另一个实验中,当a1a2杂合兔子用抗IdC抗体免疫时,只诱导出抗体3,它似乎与在a1a1兔子中诱导出的抗体3相同。然而,当a1a2杂合兔子中a2同种异型的表达被抑制,然后用抗IdC抗体免疫这只兔子时,抗体1和抗体3都被诱导出来。这些数据表明我们的免疫网络系统中发生了双向免疫反应。根据耶尔恩的网络理论,抗体3似乎是通过免疫原抗体2的独特型刺激诱导产生的,而抗体1似乎是通过免疫原抗体2的互补位的反向刺激诱导产生的。此外,在表现出双向免疫反应的这些兔子中,抗体1的产生至少比抗体3的产生大3至5倍,这表明通过反向刺激的反应似乎占主导地位。本文讨论了这种双向免疫反应的重要性。