Kopp C B, Krakow J B
Child Dev. 1983 Oct;54(5):1086-108.
This paper has 2 goals: to review the history of the developmental study of infants and children at biological risk and to appraise the current state of the art. The scope of the review is from 1920 to the present and emphasizes the role of developmentalists. 4 research phases are identified, each reflecting aspects of the social, political, health, and psychological zeitgeist. First, from 1920 to World War II, research was primarily "catalog" and had diverse themes; however, several issues were raised that continue to have relevance. Second, during the postwar years, research often focused on the cognitive and emotional residuals of handicaps, particularly cerebral palsy and poliomyelitis. Third, the 1960s marked the funding of major seminal longitudinal investigations of perinatal risk factors, and studies of very young infants "at risk." And fourth, in the last and current period, technological advances of the 1970s first applied to research with normally developing children were then extended to at-risk groups and revolutionized the methods of studying risk. Finally, we suggest that, although a considerable amount of information has been obtained about developmental phenomena subsequent to biological risk, our research literature is fragmented and difficult to synthesize. We conclude by offering strategies to foster research and the integration of knowledge.
回顾有生物学风险的婴幼儿发育研究历史,并评估当前的研究现状。回顾范围从1920年至今,重点强调发育学家的作用。确定了4个研究阶段,每个阶段都反映了社会、政治、健康和心理时代精神的不同方面。首先,从1920年到第二次世界大战,研究主要是“编目”性质,主题多样;然而,提出了几个至今仍有相关性的问题。其次,在战后时期,研究常常聚焦于残疾的认知和情感后遗症,尤其是脑瘫和小儿麻痹症。第三,20世纪60年代标志着对围产期风险因素以及“有风险”的极幼儿童进行重大开创性纵向研究获得资助。第四,在最后这个当前阶段,20世纪70年代首先应用于正常发育儿童研究的技术进步随后扩展到了有风险群体,并彻底改变了研究风险的方法。最后,我们认为,尽管已经获得了大量关于生物学风险之后发育现象的信息,但我们的研究文献零散,难以综合。我们通过提供促进研究和知识整合的策略来得出结论。